There’s hope yet for the pedestrian bridge over 250

A bridge similar to the one Diane Berlin proposes at Rolkin Road already exists on Emmet Street. The difference? Rolkin’s will be longer, with the potential to be cheaper, and will feature an elevator on one side and ramps on the other. Photo by Martyn Kyle A bridge similar to the one Diane Berlin proposes at Rolkin Road already exists on Emmet Street. The difference? Rolkin’s will be longer, with the potential to be cheaper, and will feature an elevator on one side and ramps on the other. Photo by Martyn Kyle

Though building a pedestrian bridge over Route 250 at Rolkin Road may not be the Albemarle Board of Supervisors’ first priority, the proposal hasn’t gone unnoticed.

With about 350 to 400 names on petitions advocating for the bridge and a large showing of supporters at the November 11 meeting, Pantops Community Advisory Committee member Diane Berlin says the supes gave her project a lot of attention.

“We’re in the mix,” Berlin says. “They get it.”

For now, though, supervisors say improving the safety in county schools—a project that was initiated after the shootings at Sandy Hook—takes priority.

They did approve, however, a study to find a permanent location for the pedestrian bridge and fundraising, which will begin next year, according to Berlin.

While VDOT could match funds up to $10 million for the bridge, the supervisors applauded communities in other jurisdictions that fundraised their own projects.

Berlin is skeptical. “If you ask the citizens for 10 or 20 dollars,” she says, “there’s no way they’re going to come up with a million dollars.”

Posted In:     News

Tags:     , , ,

Previous Post

Lightning fast: Ting’s grand plans to expand

Next Post

Toscano resigns, reconsiders House minority leader position

Our comments system is designed to foster a lively debate of ideas, offer a forum for the exchange of ad hoc information, and solicit honest, respectful feedback about the work we do. We’re glad you’re participating. Here are a few simple rules to follow, which should be relatively straightforward.

1) Don’t call people names or accuse them of things you cannot support.
2) Don’t direct foul language, racial slurs, or offensive terms at other commenters or our staff.
3) Don’t use the discussion on our site for commercial (or shameless personal) promotion.

We reserve the right to remove posts and ban commenters who violate any of the rules listed above, or the spirit of the discussion. We’re trying to create a safe space for a wide range of people to express themselves, and we believe that goal can only be achieved through thoughtful, sensitive editorial control.

If you have questions or comments about our policies or about a specific post, please send an e-mail to editor@c-ville.com.

2
Leave a Reply

avatar
0 Comment threads
0 Thread replies
0 Followers
 
Most reacted comment
Hottest comment thread
0 Comment authors
Recent comment authors
  Subscribe  
newest oldest most voted
Notify of