Struggling ‘Hoos, upstart Terps set to renew testy rivalry


Struggling ‘Hoos, upstart Terps set to renew testy rivalry

In November 2002, during the week leading up to his team’s game with UVA, then-Maryland coach Ralph Friedgen famously said: “We expect to beat teams like Duke and Virginia.”


That Saturday, UVA crushed Maryland, 48-13. Friedgen was fired in 2010, having lost more games than he won against the orange and blue.

At halftime of a UVA-Maryland basketball game in March 2011, Randy Edsall, Friedgen’s successor, announced to the Comcast Center crowd: “Here at Maryland, we don’t lose to Virginia.”


Eight months later, UVA dominated Maryland, 31-13. (And Virginia’s basketball team hasn’t lost to the Terps since Edsall took the microphone, either).

Maryland doesn’t like Virginia, and the feeling’s mutual. Luckily for Mike London, we can throw out the records when these two get together Saturday.

UVA (2-4, 0-2 ACC) is mired in a four-game losing streak during which it has been outscored by 87 points. The ‘Hoos have lost four of five to Duke (Duke!), including last week’s embarrassing 42-17 setback. Since starting 2-0, London’s team is allowing more than 42 points per game and ranks dead last nationally in turnover margin.

Maryland (3-2, 1-0 ACC) surpassed its 2011 win total a week ago when it came from behind to beat Wake Forest, 19-14. Edsall went just 2-10 last season, his first in College Park after jettisoning UConn. The natives remained restless after Maryland needed a fourth-quarter touchdown to get by William & Mary in its opener, 7-6, but the Terps have shown steady improvement from week to week.

Virginia has won 15 of the last 20 meetings dating back to 1992, but Maryland has taken two of the last three in Charlottesville, including a 42-23 win in Mike London’s first season at UVA.

Posted In:     News

Tags:     ,

Previous Post

Young architects take on income gap with Green Dot job hub project

Next Post

The Miller Center asks the question: Do debates matter?

Our comments system is designed to foster a lively debate of ideas, offer a forum for the exchange of ad hoc information, and solicit honest, respectful feedback about the work we do. We’re glad you’re participating. Here are a few simple rules to follow, which should be relatively straightforward.

1) Don’t call people names or accuse them of things you cannot support.
2) Don’t direct foul language, racial slurs, or offensive terms at other commenters or our staff.
3) Don’t use the discussion on our site for commercial (or shameless personal) promotion.

We reserve the right to remove posts and ban commenters who violate any of the rules listed above, or the spirit of the discussion. We’re trying to create a safe space for a wide range of people to express themselves, and we believe that goal can only be achieved through thoughtful, sensitive editorial control.

If you have questions or comments about our policies or about a specific post, please send an e-mail to

Leave a Reply

Notify of