No way, Crozet: High-density subdivision rezoning denied

Developer Kyle Redinger had hoped to make Adelaide a high-density subdivision with some affordable housing units. Since that plan was shot down, he says he’ll build the 35 high-end homes that have already been approved. Developer Kyle Redinger had hoped to make Adelaide a high-density subdivision with some affordable housing units. Since that plan was shot down, he says he’ll build the 35 high-end homes that have already been approved.

At its February 1 meeting, the Albemarle County Board of Supervisors denied a rezoning request for Adelaide, a proposed 80-unit housing development in Crozet. The project is currently zoned for one single home per acre, and developer Kyle Redinger sought a zoning change to six units per acre, which would provide more density in the area’s high-density growth area.

“I relied on county-appointed experts, the county staff and the planning commission to interpret the master plan and design guidelines for Adelaide,” Redinger says.

In a written statement, he adds, “We talk a lot in Albemarle County about being welcoming and inclusive, especially now, in the darkness and uncertainty associated with our immigrants and those most in need. But, when it comes time to creating inclusivity on a local level, it is clear that some of our leaders have a different agenda.”

A staff report from a May 10, 2016, public hearing with the planning commission listed five favorable factors about the development including: It’s consistent with the Crozet Master Plan and the neighborhood model; it includes a mix of unit types, open space, Route 250 buffer, pocket park and trails; and the developer offered cash proffers and 12 affordable housing units for rent or sale.

Of the two unfavorable factors listed in the report, increased traffic was the biggest concern to approving the project located on Route 250, next to the Cory Farm subdivision, according to county staff.

Crozet resident Judy Herring, who owns the approximately 20-acre property upon which Adelaide will be built, feels unfairly targeted by the traffic concerns. “Downtown Crozet has quite a few projects in the works and if traffic is a concern of Adelaide, what do you think it will be if all those developments go through?” she wrote in a letter to Ann Mallek, the supervisor representing the White Hall district. “[Route] 250 is the main thoroughfare road and nothing is going to change that,” says Herring, whose husband was killed in a hit-and-run accident on that road in 2013.

Mallek voted against the development and encouraged others to speak out against it. Supervisors Liz Palmer and Rick Randolph also voted against Redinger’s zoning request, killing the rezoning with a 3-3 vote.

“Their vote prevents Albemarle from building trails and connections, and it pressures growth in the rural areas,” says Redinger. “Most importantly, it permanently eliminates the opportunity for affordable housing, creating price points that are far out of reach for young families, police officers, teachers and public servants.” The decision sends “a message of exclusivity to those most in need,” he adds.

And though some think Adelaide was the perfect subdivision for the growth area, Mallek says, “I voted no because I thought that the density on the edge of the growth area, surrounded by forest and rural uses, should be at the low end of the range suggested in the comprehensive plan and master plan for Crozet.”

Switching gears, Redinger now says he’ll build 35 by-right, high-end homes that have already been approved.

Posted In:     News

Tags:     , , , ,

Previous Post

‘Constitutional crisis:’ Judge hears DMV’s motion to dismiss

Next Post

Psychic’s husband gets 33 months in prison

Our comments system is designed to foster a lively debate of ideas, offer a forum for the exchange of ad hoc information, and solicit honest, respectful feedback about the work we do. We’re glad you’re participating. Here are a few simple rules to follow, which should be relatively straightforward.

1) Don’t call people names or accuse them of things you cannot support.
2) Don’t direct foul language, racial slurs, or offensive terms at other commenters or our staff.
3) Don’t use the discussion on our site for commercial (or shameless personal) promotion.

We reserve the right to remove posts and ban commenters who violate any of the rules listed above, or the spirit of the discussion. We’re trying to create a safe space for a wide range of people to express themselves, and we believe that goal can only be achieved through thoughtful, sensitive editorial control.

If you have questions or comments about our policies or about a specific post, please send an e-mail to

Leave a Reply

Notify of