Morbidity rates: Optima’s health insurance premium calculations challenged

Sara Stovall and Ian Dixon met with Senator Tim Kaine, far right, and Kristen Molloy, his senior health policy advisor,  and legislative correspondent Nicholas Widmyer.
Photo courtesy Senator Kaine's office. Sara Stovall and Ian Dixon met with Senator Tim Kaine, far right, and Kristen Molloy, his senior health policy advisor, and legislative correspondent Nicholas Widmyer. Photo courtesy Senator Kaine’s office.


In November, Sara Stovall was grappling with a health insurance premium that had skyrocketed from $940 a month to $3,000 for her family of four in the Charlottesville market, which found itself with the highest rates in the country.

Now Stovall says she has a better idea of why this area’s rates are so high. She believes Optima Health—the area’s only individual policy provider—used a factor in calculating health insurance premiums that the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services forbids—and she says its incoming CEO admitted as much in a December 14 meeting.

Stovall and fellow Charlottesville resident Ian Dixon met with Optima CEO Michael Dudley and his successor, Dennis Mathias. It was there that in explaining why Charlottesville’s rates are so high, according to Stovall and Dixon, Mathias said, “The morbidity of the people buying in this marketplace is higher than other parts of the state.”

The two say Dudley further explained that morbidity is “how sick people are.”

And that’s a big no-no in HHS’ 2018 Unified Rate Review Instructions: “Geographic factors may not reflect differences in morbidity by region.”

To Dixon and Stovall, inclusion of morbidity as a factor would explain why a Charlottesvillian would pay 68 percent more for a bronze health plan than someone in the Hampton Roads area.

They point out that Optima’s filings use an area rating factor for Charlottesville that’s 58 percent higher than Hampton Roads—but they say Anthem’s area rating for Charlottesville was lower than Hampton Roads. “There’s no history of our area being rated this high,” says Dixon.

Another factor they question is the difference between Optima’s individual policy rates and the small group rates it offers businesses. In Charlottesville, the small group rate is significantly lower than an individual plan, despite both using the same providers and the same provider reimbursement rates, says Dixon.

“We don’t see any justification for the 58 percent difference from small group and individual rates,” says Stovall.

“They said small groups are healthier,” says Dixon. “The health of the population and morbidity cannot be used in setting the rates.”

In a statement from Optima’s Dudley, he does not address the question of whether morbidity was used in how the company calculated its Charlottesville premiums.

“We have carefully revisited our 2018 premium calculations,” and determined the calculations were accurate, reviewed by third-party actuarial experts and approved by the Virginia Bureau of Insurance and the Centers for Medicaid and Medicare Services, he says.

Optima did not respond to a question about the statements allegedly made by Dudley and Mathias on morbidity, but says, “This is a very complex issue, and we correctly addressed all appropriate adjustments in accordance with state and federal laws, and, as required by the regulations, the geographic factors did not reflect differences in morbidity by region.

Stovall and Dixon met with people from Virginia’s Bureau of Insurance, and say that while those in the meeting initially were skeptical about their concerns, “by the end of the meeting they felt our concerns were valid,” says Stovall.

“You’ll have to rely on what they’re telling you as far as the meeting goes,” says Ken Schrad, spokesperson for the State Corporation Commission, under which the Bureau of Insurance resides.

“The bureau can always seek further information to be responsive to an inquiry or complaint from an already accepted filing,” he says.

Would Optima’s request for premium rates that are the highest in the country raise any red flags at the Bureau of Insurance? Says Schrad, “There’s so many factors that go into filing for insurance plans. To point out one factor alone as driving something would be hard to do.”

Optima maintains that when Anthem pulled out of the Charlottesville market, leaving zero insurance providers, despite business advisors telling the insurer to steer clear, it was asked by the commonwealth to come in and cover as many people as it could.

Optima Health is owned by Sentara, which also owns Sentara Martha Jefferson Hospital here. Optima did not respond to a question about whether that also was a factor in its decision to offer coverage here.

The company did say it had lost more than $30 million in the past three years in Virginia under the Affordable Care Act and this “is not sustainable.”

And Dudley’s response to Stovall and Dixon suggests they move on. “The reality is that premium rates are locked in for 2018,” he says. He adds the wish that “Washington would establish an environment that allows for affordable health plans.”

While Dixon considers the response “evasive” in not addressing “the crux of our complaint about morbidity,” he and Stovall are with Dudley on one point. They plan to escalate with the Bureau of Insurance and go back to their senators and congressman to figure out why Charlottesville can’t get affordable care.

Updated December 27 with Optima’s denial that morbidity was used to calculate Charlottesville’s health insurance premiums.

Posted In:     News

Tags:     , , , , , , ,

Previous Post

The Heather Heyer way

Next Post

In brief: City departures, a random drawing and Coran’s cannabis (or lack thereof)

Our comments system is designed to foster a lively debate of ideas, offer a forum for the exchange of ad hoc information, and solicit honest, respectful feedback about the work we do. We’re glad you’re participating. Here are a few simple rules to follow, which should be relatively straightforward.

1) Don’t call people names or accuse them of things you cannot support.
2) Don’t direct foul language, racial slurs, or offensive terms at other commenters or our staff.
3) Don’t use the discussion on our site for commercial (or shameless personal) promotion.

We reserve the right to remove posts and ban commenters who violate any of the rules listed above, or the spirit of the discussion. We’re trying to create a safe space for a wide range of people to express themselves, and we believe that goal can only be achieved through thoughtful, sensitive editorial control.

If you have questions or comments about our policies or about a specific post, please send an e-mail to

Leave a Reply

Notify of