In deep: Allegations of mismanagement complicate Louisa’s demand for water

Construction of a water pump station at the confluence of the James and Rivanna rivers has hit a permitting roadblock due to concerns about the project’s impact on a Monacan site. PC: Carrie Pruitt Construction of a water pump station at the confluence of the James and Rivanna rivers has hit a permitting roadblock due to concerns about the project’s impact on a Monacan site. PC: Carrie Pruitt

By Spencer Philps 

A host of issues have emerged in recent months that look to complicate the James River Water Authority’s plans to construct a water pump station at the confluence of the James and Rivanna rivers. The site, today referred to as Point of Fork, is also the location of Rassawek, the historic capital of the Monacan Indian Nation.

As development has boomed in Zion Crossroads, despite a dwindling supply of groundwater, Louisa and Fluvanna counties have sought an alternate long-term water source, and formed the authority to pump water to the area from the James. 

The Monacans, a tribe federally recognized in 2018, have fiercely opposed the construction project, saying it will irreparably harm the culturally significant site, as well as disturb the remains of Monacans likely to be buried there. More than 1,300 individuals and organizations have signed a letter sent to the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and Governor Ralph Northam opposing the project.

Although the JRWA has able to secure two permits for the pump station, it still needs at least two more: one from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers for impacts to streams and wetlands under federal jurisdiction, and one from the Virginia Department of Historic Resources for a second anticipatory burial permit in case the water authority encounters burial sites or human remains during excavation.

The JRWA has faced roadblocks for both permits. On September 6, the Virginia Department of Historic Resources issued a letter stating that it would be unable to issue a permit in part because it had deemed the archeological consultant on the project, Carol Tyrer and her firm, Circa Cultural Resource Management, lacked the necessary qualifications. 

On September 10, the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers issued a letter to the JRWA saying it had become aware of the issues with Carol Tyrer and her firm, and based upon the “concerns and uncertainty regarding the proposed project’s impact to historic properties,” was now requiring JRWA to undergo a more comprehensive individual permitting process for the project.

Things grew increasingly fraught in October, when a former employee of Circa Cultural Resource Management brought forward allegations of wrongdoing at the Rassawek site. The whistleblower, Eric Mai, alleged that Circa sent an unqualified and untrained crew to survey and excavate at the site, lied to DHR officials, produced misleading and plagiarized reports, and did not provide appropriate resources or equipment for workers, resulting in the maltreatment of artifacts. Mai alleges that Circa went so far as to alter his resume to give him qualifications he did not possess, unbeknownst to him at the time. 

“The whistleblower came forward with more information with what happened out there at the archeological study at Point of Fork, which was just devastating,” says attorney Marion Werkheiser, whose firm represents the Monacan Indian Nation. “It’s clear that they were using construction workers to excavate the most sensitive parts of the site, who had no training, no supervision. We’ll never know what was lost in that process.”  

John Smith documented the Monacan capital Rassawek at the confluence of the James and Rivanna rivers in 1612. PC: Library of Congress

Justin Curtis, the lawyer representing the JRWA, says there is still an ongoing investigation into the allegations raised by Mai. 

“Nothing has been stated publicly about that process because we are still evaluating the information and haven’t come to any conclusions at this time.” Curtis says. “Everything is being fully vetted and fully evaluated.”

As a result of the whistleblower report, the Monacan Nation is now arguing that the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers is legally barred from giving a permit to the JRWA per Section 110(k) of the National Historic Preservation Act, which states that federal agencies are forbidden to issue a permit to an applicant who has “intentionally significantly adversely affected a historic property to which the grant would relate.” 

“The way that we read that whistleblower complaint, it was clear that there had been destruction of the site as a result of Circa’s work there,” Werkheiser says. 

Curtis says he strongly disagrees with this conclusion. 

“That section…is intended to prevent unscrupulous parties from going out and intentionally destroying historical or cultural resources and then claiming ‘Oh, there’s no resources here’ after they’ve already gone out and destroyed them. That’s clearly not what’s happened here.” he says. 

The Monacan Nation has notified the Army Corps of Engineers about its concerns, but Werkheiser says it does not expect a response until the water authority completes its application.

Meanwhile, in November, the JRWA filed a lawsuit against the Virginia Department of Historic Resources, contesting the department’s conclusions about Tyrer’s qualifications and arguing that it was not involved in processes that ought to have been afforded it under state and departmental regulations. And Tyrer has filed her own lawsuit against the DHR in the Virginia Circuit Court for Williamsburg and James City County. She declined to comment for this story. 

Curtis says that he is optimistic that the issue can be resolved “through further discussions with DHR,” and believes that the JRWA will be able to submit its completed permit application to the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers by January. 

Posted In:     News

Tags:     , , , , , , , ,

Previous Post

SLAPP-happy: Virginia’s weak anti-SLAPP law attracts defamation lawsuits

Next Post

Pushing forward: Albemarle writer’s lawsuit goes to trial

Our comments system is designed to foster a lively debate of ideas, offer a forum for the exchange of ad hoc information, and solicit honest, respectful feedback about the work we do. We’re glad you’re participating. Here are a few simple rules to follow, which should be relatively straightforward.

1) Don’t call people names or accuse them of things you cannot support.
2) Don’t direct foul language, racial slurs, or offensive terms at other commenters or our staff.
3) Don’t use the discussion on our site for commercial (or shameless personal) promotion.

We reserve the right to remove posts and ban commenters who violate any of the rules listed above, or the spirit of the discussion. We’re trying to create a safe space for a wide range of people to express themselves, and we believe that goal can only be achieved through thoughtful, sensitive editorial control.

If you have questions or comments about our policies or about a specific post, please send an e-mail to

Leave a Reply

1 Comment threads
0 Thread replies
Most reacted comment
Hottest comment thread
1 Comment authors
Jeremy Caplin Recent comment authors
newest oldest most voted
Notify of
Jeremy Caplin
Jeremy Caplin

so who is doing the calculation on how much water the developers plan to take out of the James to spur growth at Zion Crossroads, and what are the limits? Its beautiful , peaceful country down there at Rasawek; hope the developers and water seekers don’t rip up the land and the riverside too much and spoil the natural beauty.