Flowing with traffic: Up and running, the 250 interchange aims to be a good neighbor

Photo: Skip Degan Photo: Skip Degan

Most architecture, by nature, wants to be noticed. But sometimes design aims to fly under the radar—to seamlessly blend with its surroundings. That’s a tall order when the project in question is a 16.3-acre, multi-million-dollar roadway interchange that helped inspire a decade or more of dogged citizen protests (not to mention legal action) before it finally got built.

We speak, of course, of the intersection of Rte. 250, McIntire Road and the John W. Warner Parkway (better known, during all those years of fierce debate, as the Meadow Creek Parkway). With traffic now flowing freely through the intersection in all directions, one can finally see the project in a fully functional, non-theoretical state.

What was built here required many, many designers, both amateur and professional. As a Program Manager for the City of Charlottesville, Jeanette Janiczek has had a ringside seat for the conversation for the last eight-plus years.

The constituencies were legion. Veterans’ groups weighed in on the treatment of the Dogwood Vietnam Memorial (one of the country’s first memorials from that conflict) within the final design. Neighborhood groups had input on the entrances to their residential streets. The needs of neighboring entities like MACAA and the Covenant School had to be considered, and planners tried to give serious weight to the experience of pedestrians and cyclists.

The city’s Planning Commission and Tree Commission were involved. And, certainly, numerous concerned citizens made their wishes known—not least in regard to historic McIntire Park, along the border of which the parkway itself would travel.

Yet as complex as the project was, it mostly came down to this: “We wanted it as small as possible and as pretty as possible,” said Janiczek. Citizen input indicated that greenery would be preferred to concrete, and the Board of Architectural Review recommended as low-profile an overpass as could be built. “They wanted a narrow structure of a bridge that almost melted away,” said Janiczek.

Rummel Klepper & Kahl, the firm with primary design responsibilities, indeed created a very slim overpass that’s flanked not by massive-looking concrete abutments, but by embankments planted with low-maintenance meadow grass.

Given that one of the stated goals of the project was to “create a gateway experience into the city,” said Janiczek, aesthetic details mattered. Concrete bridge supports, for example, are not simply utilitarian massifs, but are stamped and painted to give the appearance of stonework. “It had to look random, with no repeating pattern,” said Janiczek.

She acknowledges the controversy surrounding all elements of the parkway, but ultimately has praise for the process: “Because of the issues that were raised, it helped the design team really hear what the public wanted,” she said. “The key is the conversation.”

Posted In:     Abode,Magazines


Previous Post

The study of living: Architect Julie Dixon focuses on the use of space

Next Post

One for all: Universal design principles are rolling into area bathrooms

Our comments system is designed to foster a lively debate of ideas, offer a forum for the exchange of ad hoc information, and solicit honest, respectful feedback about the work we do. We’re glad you’re participating. Here are a few simple rules to follow, which should be relatively straightforward.

1) Don’t call people names or accuse them of things you cannot support.
2) Don’t direct foul language, racial slurs, or offensive terms at other commenters or our staff.
3) Don’t use the discussion on our site for commercial (or shameless personal) promotion.

We reserve the right to remove posts and ban commenters who violate any of the rules listed above, or the spirit of the discussion. We’re trying to create a safe space for a wide range of people to express themselves, and we believe that goal can only be achieved through thoughtful, sensitive editorial control.

If you have questions or comments about our policies or about a specific post, please send an e-mail to editor@c-ville.com.

Leave a Reply

0 Comment threads
0 Thread replies
Most reacted comment
Hottest comment thread
0 Comment authors
Recent comment authors
newest oldest most voted
Notify of