ABC officials file motion to dismiss Martese Johnson’s lawsuit

Martese Johnson 's lawsuit claims he was "permanently disfigured" during his encounter with ABC agents. Photo: Jackson Smith Martese Johnson ‘s lawsuit claims he was “permanently disfigured” during his encounter with ABC agents. Photo: Jackson Smith

Three ABC agents and its director filed a motion in U.S. District Court November 16 to dismiss all seven claims in UVA student Martese Johnson’s $3 million lawsuit stemming from his encounter with agents last March that left him bloody and needing 10 stitches.

Johnson alleges false arrest, excessive force, negligence and battery against special agents John Cielakie, Thomas Custer and Jared Miller in his suit. Against Miller, Johnson makes a further claim of assault.

He accuses the Virginia Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control and its director, Shawn Walker, of negligent supervision and training, and a failure to train or supervise.

In response, the defense claims that as an agency under the control of the commonwealth and not as a single person, the ABC is protected by Eleventh Amendment immunity, meaning a lawsuit cannot be heard against them.

The defense also sought to exempt Walker from the claims made against him by insisting that he “…was not present at the event and there is insufficient evidence to show that he was negligent.”

The physical contact between Johnson and the three ABC officers was reasonable, according to the defense, because they had “probable cause” to believe Johnson was using a fake ID, which is a Class 1 Misdemeanor.

Johnson’s repeated attempts to free himself from the officers restraining him were cited as justification for the amount of force used by the ABC officials, according to the motion.

“The plaintiff performed such acts [pulling away wordlessly from the officers] no less than three times during the stop,” the motion reads. “In a tense and uncertain situation, these acts could have caused a reasonable officer to make the split-second decision that force was necessary to prevent the plaintiff from leaving the scene or to protect his safety.”

The defense further claims that because Johnson received medical treatment after his arrest, it is not “plausible” to claim that the officers had used excessive force in arresting him.


Posted In:     News

Tags:     , ,

Previous Post

Weather-wise, locals are lucking out

Next Post

Virginia band marches to Macy’s for Thanksgiving Day Parade

Our comments system is designed to foster a lively debate of ideas, offer a forum for the exchange of ad hoc information, and solicit honest, respectful feedback about the work we do. We’re glad you’re participating. Here are a few simple rules to follow, which should be relatively straightforward.

1) Don’t call people names or accuse them of things you cannot support.
2) Don’t direct foul language, racial slurs, or offensive terms at other commenters or our staff.
3) Don’t use the discussion on our site for commercial (or shameless personal) promotion.

We reserve the right to remove posts and ban commenters who violate any of the rules listed above, or the spirit of the discussion. We’re trying to create a safe space for a wide range of people to express themselves, and we believe that goal can only be achieved through thoughtful, sensitive editorial control.

If you have questions or comments about our policies or about a specific post, please send an e-mail to

Leave a Reply

0 Comment threads
0 Thread replies
Most reacted comment
Hottest comment thread
0 Comment authors
Recent comment authors
newest oldest most voted
Notify of