Studying what walkers need

Studying what walkers need

Studying what walkers need

Do big cities have anything to teach towns the size of Charlottesville, or for that matter, suburban areas like those in Albemarle, about creating safe places for pedestrians? A new report suggests that development patterns are the key to walkability, so the success of larger urban areas may well hold lessons for us here at home.

Portland, Oregon

The study, published jointly by the Surface Transportation Policy Partnership and Transportation for America, ranks 52 American cities of at least 1 million residents by their pedestrian safety in 2007-2008.

Richmond is the 24th safest and the Washington, D.C. are is number 32 out of 52 total—which isn’t great, but isn’t terrible either, considering that all the worst cities for walkers are in the South. Meanwhile, older and usually more compact cities in the Northeast tend to score much better, and a city that Charlottesville leaders have explicitly looked to as a transportation model—Portland, Oregon—makes a strong showing as well.

The report points out that more than 76,000 American pedestrians have been killed in the last 15 years.


The 10 safest:

Minneapolis-St. Paul
New York
Portland, Oregon

The 10 most dangerous:












Blueprint for density

Appended to Albemarle County’s Comprehensive Plan in May 2001, the Neighborhood Model calls for the following 12 principles to guide planning and construction within the county’s development areas:

Pedestrian Orientation

Neighborhood Friendly Streets and Paths

Transportation Networks and Interconnected Streets

Parks and Open Space

Mixed Uses

Neighborhood Centers

Buildings and Spaces of Human Scale

Relegated Parking

Affordability with Dignity

Redevelopment Site Planning That Respects Terrain

Clear Boundaries with the Rural Areas

Posted In:     News

Previous Post

Northern exposure

Next Post

Phone-y business

Our comments system is designed to foster a lively debate of ideas, offer a forum for the exchange of ad hoc information, and solicit honest, respectful feedback about the work we do. We’re glad you’re participating. Here are a few simple rules to follow, which should be relatively straightforward.

1) Don’t call people names or accuse them of things you cannot support.
2) Don’t direct foul language, racial slurs, or offensive terms at other commenters or our staff.
3) Don’t use the discussion on our site for commercial (or shameless personal) promotion.

We reserve the right to remove posts and ban commenters who violate any of the rules listed above, or the spirit of the discussion. We’re trying to create a safe space for a wide range of people to express themselves, and we believe that goal can only be achieved through thoughtful, sensitive editorial control.

If you have questions or comments about our policies or about a specific post, please send an e-mail to

Leave a Reply

Notify of