Joel Salatin takes down conservation easements

I had to chuckle when I saw the headline on Joel Salatin’s column in Flavor magazine’s December/January issue. "Beware Those Sincere Conservation Easements." Only Joel! The guy is a true iconoclast.

Conservation easements have been a pet idea of the environmental community around here. Landowners give up development rights, government gives them tax breaks, and open space remains for all to enjoy. Tim Kaine exceeded his 400,000-acre land conservation goal largely through counting up conservation easements during his term in the governor’s office. It’s been a given in certain circles that it’s way better to have an easement on a property than to see it carved up into ticky-tacky house lots.

Which (unless you’re a homebuilder or developer) is pretty inarguable. But I’d never thought about the incompatability of easements and farming until I read Salatin’s piece. He points out that since no new structures may be built on land under easement, farmers may find themselves hamstrung in developing and strengthening their operations.

"Economic viability [for farms] today demands value-adding, which means on-farm infrastructure like you would expect to see in Williamsburg. Too often those policing these easements want to see cows, pretty pastures, and bucolic gambrel barns without realizing that such a landscape never existed sustainably. Real profitable and ecologically sensible working farms had smokehouses, butchering facilities, housing for workers, inventory and distribution centers, and a host of other synergistic enterprises."

It’s a compelling case. Anyone else have an opinion? I can’t find the story on Flavor’s site, so you’ll have to pick up a copy (check Rev Soup) to read it for yourself.

Posted In:     Uncategorized

Previous Post

UVA increases low-income student enrollment

Next Post

Time after time

Our comments system is designed to foster a lively debate of ideas, offer a forum for the exchange of ad hoc information, and solicit honest, respectful feedback about the work we do. We’re glad you’re participating. Here are a few simple rules to follow, which should be relatively straightforward.

1) Don’t call people names or accuse them of things you cannot support.
2) Don’t direct foul language, racial slurs, or offensive terms at other commenters or our staff.
3) Don’t use the discussion on our site for commercial (or shameless personal) promotion.

We reserve the right to remove posts and ban commenters who violate any of the rules listed above, or the spirit of the discussion. We’re trying to create a safe space for a wide range of people to express themselves, and we believe that goal can only be achieved through thoughtful, sensitive editorial control.

If you have questions or comments about our policies or about a specific post, please send an e-mail to

Leave a Reply

Notify of