Jury deliberates for third day in Rolling Stone trial

Jury deliberates for third day in Rolling Stone trial

The waiting game continues Friday for Nicole Eramo, Sabrina Erdely and Rolling Stone deputy managing editor Sean Woods, along with their lawyers, support staff and the media as Day 16 in Eramo’s defamation lawsuit trial against the magazine begins and the jury deliberates for a third day.

The jury will decide whether Rolling Stone acted with actual malice when it published the now-retracted “A Rape on Campus” November 19, 2014. The story recounted first-year Jackie’s lurid tale of a gang rape at Phi Kappa Psi, which wreaked havoc on grounds at UVA before her account fell apart within a few weeks. A later Charlottesville Police investigation could find no evidence of the assault.

Eramo’s $7.5 million complaint says she was unfairly depicted as an indifferent administrator who tried to steer sexual assault victims from reporting to police to keep rape statistics low, because, “Nobody wants to send their daughter to the rape school,” a statement in the article she says she never made.

The case drew national attention, and even now reporters from the Washington Post, New York Times, CNN and ABC are waiting for a decision.

“The only thing predictable about a jury is its unpredictability,” says legal expert David Heilberg, who is not connected to the case.

And if the jury rules in favor of Eramo, the trial will continue with a damages phase, which her attorney Libby Locke has estimated could take another half day of testimony. That will send the jury back to determine how much to award.

Posted In:     News

Tags:     , , , ,

Previous Post

Graffiti on Grounds: UVA condemns hate speech—again

Next Post

Judgment day: Jury rules in Eramo’s favor

Our comments system is designed to foster a lively debate of ideas, offer a forum for the exchange of ad hoc information, and solicit honest, respectful feedback about the work we do. We’re glad you’re participating. Here are a few simple rules to follow, which should be relatively straightforward.

1) Don’t call people names or accuse them of things you cannot support.
2) Don’t direct foul language, racial slurs, or offensive terms at other commenters or our staff.
3) Don’t use the discussion on our site for commercial (or shameless personal) promotion.

We reserve the right to remove posts and ban commenters who violate any of the rules listed above, or the spirit of the discussion. We’re trying to create a safe space for a wide range of people to express themselves, and we believe that goal can only be achieved through thoughtful, sensitive editorial control.

If you have questions or comments about our policies or about a specific post, please send an e-mail to editor@c-ville.com.

Leave a Reply

Notify of