Judge Swett rules Meadowcreek land transfer legitimate

Judge Swett rules Meadowcreek land transfer legitimate

After questioning the constitutionality of a May 19 ruling that transferred an easement of city land to VDOT for the Meadowcreek Parkway, plaintiffs in the case—five residents, the North Downtown Residents Association and the Coalition to Preserve McIntire Park—attended another hearing June 26 in which Judge Jay Swett ruled the transfer legal and legitimate.

"…Under the facts of this case, a three-fourths vote of the Charlottesville City Council is not required to convey a road construction easement to the Commonwealth of Virginia," Swett stated. "This is not the type of conveyance contemplated by the framers of the Constitution in adopting Section 125 of the 1902 Virginia Constitution or Section 9 of Article VII of the Revised Coastitution adopted in 1972."

Opponents of the ruling released a statement yesterday detailing their consideration of an appeal. "We continue to believe that the conveyance of public land from the City of Charlottesville to VDOT was a violation of Article VII, section 9 of the Virginia Constitution," the release states. "We recognize that there is a better opportunity to stop the parkway in federal court."

Read more about the Meadowcreek Parkway here, including C-VILLE’s most recent story in this week’s issue.

Is this sign obsolete, now that the Meadowcreek Parkway seems to be truly on its way?

 

 

Posted In:     Uncategorized

Previous Post

Follow C-VILLE on Twitter

Next Post

NEW C-VILLE COVER STORY: Under water

Our comments system is designed to foster a lively debate of ideas, offer a forum for the exchange of ad hoc information, and solicit honest, respectful feedback about the work we do. We’re glad you’re participating. Here are a few simple rules to follow, which should be relatively straightforward.

1) Don’t call people names or accuse them of things you cannot support.
2) Don’t direct foul language, racial slurs, or offensive terms at other commenters or our staff.
3) Don’t use the discussion on our site for commercial (or shameless personal) promotion.

We reserve the right to remove posts and ban commenters who violate any of the rules listed above, or the spirit of the discussion. We’re trying to create a safe space for a wide range of people to express themselves, and we believe that goal can only be achieved through thoughtful, sensitive editorial control.

If you have questions or comments about our policies or about a specific post, please send an e-mail to editor@c-ville.com.

Leave a Reply

avatar
  Subscribe  
Notify of