City Council approves William Taylor Plaza

Neighbors aren't too thrilled that William Taylor Plaza will be home of a Fairfield Inn on the corner of Ridge and Cherry,
BCA Architects and Engineers Neighbors aren’t too thrilled that William Taylor Plaza will be home of a Fairfield Inn on the corner of Ridge and Cherry, BCA Architects and Engineers

The controversial development that puts a Fairfield Inn on the corner of Ridge Street and Cherry Avenue, nixed by the Planning Commission 5-0 and rejected by more than 500 petition-signing residents, got a 3-2 go-ahead from City Council July 21.

The Southern Development project was in front of council a few weeks ago, and a  decision on a rezoning amendment was postponed when the developer said residential wasn’t a necessary component in the mixed-use parcel. Later, Charlie Armstrong admitted he was mistaken about the residential portion being optional.

City Councilor Dede Smith, who was one of the “no” votes along with Bob Fenwick, isn’t reassured. Her concern is that if Marriott buys the entire parcel, it could decide to never build the residential portion on Ridge Street.

For resident Kim Lauter, the decision was disappointing and she says not supportive of the historic neighborhood. “It should be a wonderful gateway to the city,” she says. “Instead it’s a chain hotel that could be on any corner in America.

City Councilor Kathy Galvin, who is running for reelection, called the “insinuation that people can be bought and sold” for accepting donations from the Monticello Business Alliance, a developer-heavy PAC that includes Southern Development, “character assassination.” She noted that the $500 donation she got from the group was public record, and a small portion of the $17,000 she raised. Candidates Wes Bellamy and Mike Signer also received $500 donations from the group.

Posted In:     News


Previous Post

Jim jumps in: Can you feel the Gilmentum?

Next Post

Lightning rod: Commonwealth’s Attorney Denise Lunsford talks Mark Weiner, capital murder and that dress

Our comments system is designed to foster a lively debate of ideas, offer a forum for the exchange of ad hoc information, and solicit honest, respectful feedback about the work we do. We’re glad you’re participating. Here are a few simple rules to follow, which should be relatively straightforward.

1) Don’t call people names or accuse them of things you cannot support.
2) Don’t direct foul language, racial slurs, or offensive terms at other commenters or our staff.
3) Don’t use the discussion on our site for commercial (or shameless personal) promotion.

We reserve the right to remove posts and ban commenters who violate any of the rules listed above, or the spirit of the discussion. We’re trying to create a safe space for a wide range of people to express themselves, and we believe that goal can only be achieved through thoughtful, sensitive editorial control.

If you have questions or comments about our policies or about a specific post, please send an e-mail to

Leave a Reply

0 Comment threads
0 Thread replies
Most reacted comment
Hottest comment thread
0 Comment authors
Recent comment authors
newest oldest most voted
Notify of