Capitol chaos: What just happened in Richmond?

Governor Terry McAuliffe. Photo: John Robinson Governor Terry McAuliffe. Photo: John Robinson

We have a budget—that’s the good news,” Del. David Toscano said Monday afternoon. The House minority leader and Charlottesville rep was on his cell, en route to Richmond for an evening legislative session to vote on Governor Terry McAuliffe’s budget vetoes. The good news, at least for any remaining hopes of bipartisan agreement on Medicaid in the Commonwealth, ended there, and according to local lawmakers, Virginia is headed for an ugly legal fight over executive power.

Among McAuliffe’s eight line-item vetoes of the two-year, $96 billion budget was one that eliminated a Republican amendment blocking the governor from expanding Medicaid to 400,000 Virginians—something Democrats see as crucial for proper implementation of the Affordable Care Act, but which Republicans have staunchly opposed—without the sanction of the legislature.

But neither House nor Senate voted on whether to uphold or overturn that particular veto, because House Speaker William J. Howell ruled that McAuliffe had overstepped his authority by striking out part of the Medicaid item, effectively dismissing the vetoes before the legislature could consider them. 

“I expected the House Republicans would use parliamentary maneuvers to deny us a vote,” Toscano said Tuesday morning, “and that’s exactly what they did.”

Republican Rob Bell, who represents part of Albemarle in the House, saw it differently. It was a straightforward matter of what the Constitution says the governor can and can’t do, he said. He can veto a full line item, but not part of one, and that’s what he attempted last week. Bell said there’s precedent for the Republicans’ decision to essentially ignore the veto on the grounds that it was too precise. Similar showdowns in the past have ended with the court ruling in favor of legislators, he said.  

In a statement after Monday’s session, McAuliffe slammed the Republicans’ move, calling Howell’s ruling “a procedural gimmick.” 

“I’m sure it’s a hassle to have to deal with a divided government and the system of checks and balances we have,” said Bell. “But the system is set up that way to make sure that he can’t simply do what he wants by fiat. We on our side honestly believe that this is not the right policy choice for Virginia.”

Even before Monday’s session, McAuliffe had vowed to keep pushing for Medicaid expansion with or without the approval of the legislature, and he’s indicated he’ll make good on that promise by viewing the House’s non-vote as a failure to override his veto, Toscano said. 

“If he does something like that and expands Medicaid, he’ll be sued, which is what people are seeing coming down the pike,” he said. McAuliffe isn’t the only one digging in. According to reports out of the statehouse, Republicans in the Senate used their new majority—the result of the surprise resignation of Democrat Phil Puckett shortly before the passage of the budget—to seize control of all the body’s committees.

Partisan battles between the Commonwealth’s chief executive and its legislators are nothing new, and they’ve ended up in the courtroom before, Toscano pointed out, but “it’s unfortunate, because there were a number of compromises, and yet there’s no effort to meet anybody halfway, or even a quarter of the way. It didn’t need to be this way.”

Posted In:     News


Previous Post

UVA baseball to play in winner-take-all game Wednesday night

Next Post

StreamWatch report reveals decade-long poor water quality in Rivanna River watershed

Our comments system is designed to foster a lively debate of ideas, offer a forum for the exchange of ad hoc information, and solicit honest, respectful feedback about the work we do. We’re glad you’re participating. Here are a few simple rules to follow, which should be relatively straightforward.

1) Don’t call people names or accuse them of things you cannot support.
2) Don’t direct foul language, racial slurs, or offensive terms at other commenters or our staff.
3) Don’t use the discussion on our site for commercial (or shameless personal) promotion.

We reserve the right to remove posts and ban commenters who violate any of the rules listed above, or the spirit of the discussion. We’re trying to create a safe space for a wide range of people to express themselves, and we believe that goal can only be achieved through thoughtful, sensitive editorial control.

If you have questions or comments about our policies or about a specific post, please send an e-mail to

Leave a Reply

0 Comment threads
0 Thread replies
Most reacted comment
Hottest comment thread
0 Comment authors
Recent comment authors
newest oldest most voted
Notify of