To rejoice or not about Biscuit Run?

When I first heard through the grapevine that Biscuit Run might become a state park instead of 3,100 houses, I said, "This is like a Christmas present." This was the mirror image of my reaction in 2005 when I first heard about those houses. Back then, I probably said something like "This is a fat lump of coal."

It’s true that my gut feeling remains unfriendly toward the notion of tearing down trees to put up subdivisions. That’s a deep-seated reaction and one I will probably continue to have forever. What’s more, I lived on Old Lynchburg Road when I first came to Charlottesville and my early love for the area was closely tied to that winding, one-and-a-half-lane drive through thickly wooded acreage. Had I grown up on that road, I can only imagine how devastating it would be to contemplate a shiny, new neighborhood replacing the trees.

So I can’t help but be happy that the economy seems to have nixed the development plan that passed the county in 2007 and would certainly have heavily impacted the area just south of town.

However—however!—I can definitely see the point that county development director Mark Graham makes in this story. If you’re a county planner and your job is to prevent sprawl in rural areas, you probably would see the 1,200 acres of Biscuit Run as prime real estate for denser growth, which is exactly what the county’s master plan calls for. Give that up, and in the usual calculus of growth, you are pushing the new houses into some other area—some other person’s beloved open space.

It’s tricky. But I have no hesitation in being glad that the recession, though painful for many people, is giving us a collective opportunity to pause and think about what we’re doing with our land. Once houses are built, there’s no going back.

How do you feel about the news?


Posted In:     Uncategorized

Previous Post

City, county share props for LEAP program

Next Post

Mike London is new head coach

Our comments system is designed to foster a lively debate of ideas, offer a forum for the exchange of ad hoc information, and solicit honest, respectful feedback about the work we do. We’re glad you’re participating. Here are a few simple rules to follow, which should be relatively straightforward.

1) Don’t call people names or accuse them of things you cannot support.
2) Don’t direct foul language, racial slurs, or offensive terms at other commenters or our staff.
3) Don’t use the discussion on our site for commercial (or shameless personal) promotion.

We reserve the right to remove posts and ban commenters who violate any of the rules listed above, or the spirit of the discussion. We’re trying to create a safe space for a wide range of people to express themselves, and we believe that goal can only be achieved through thoughtful, sensitive editorial control.

If you have questions or comments about our policies or about a specific post, please send an e-mail to

Leave a Reply

Notify of