The web on Webb

Allow me to continue the lovefest that has recently swelled around Virginia Senator Jim Webb (C-VILLE joins in here). As the Democratic primary plays itself out (ohgodpleaseend), VP talk about Webb has increased.

Local blogger Jack Landers at Rule .303 argues that Webb could be of real use to Barack Obama and gives the example of how Webb continues to hammer John McCain with his GI Bill. It’s a pretty common sentiment that Webb would balance out the Dem ticket with his military experience, something (the only thing?) that McCain is running hard on. Says Landers:

"Jim Webb as a running mate would make the perfect weapon against John McCain for Barack Obama. And it is those same skills that have made him such a perfect weapon that would also enable him to serve as an extraordinarily capable Vice President, turning administration proposals into reality in both the military and the Senate. Hopefully, we’ll get that new GI bill passed along the way."

Marc Ambinder of The Atlantic notes the timing of Webb’s new book, and Slate does a lap around the Internet and picks out what some bloggers have to say about Webb vis-a-vis the VP slot.

And then there’s Dan Savage of The Stranger (yes, that Dan Savage), who floats the Obama-Webb ticket idea. The comments at the bottom of Savage’s post offer some good pro/con rationale for offering the VP slot to Webb. Personally, I’d hate to see a special election in Virginia for Webb’s newly vacated seat for two reasons. First, for a freshman senator, Webb seems to swing a big stick on the Hill. Second, can you think of another Democratic candidate that Virginia would elect in his place?

Posted In:     Uncategorized

Previous Post

Profiles in courage

Next Post


Our comments system is designed to foster a lively debate of ideas, offer a forum for the exchange of ad hoc information, and solicit honest, respectful feedback about the work we do. We’re glad you’re participating. Here are a few simple rules to follow, which should be relatively straightforward.

1) Don’t call people names or accuse them of things you cannot support.
2) Don’t direct foul language, racial slurs, or offensive terms at other commenters or our staff.
3) Don’t use the discussion on our site for commercial (or shameless personal) promotion.

We reserve the right to remove posts and ban commenters who violate any of the rules listed above, or the spirit of the discussion. We’re trying to create a safe space for a wide range of people to express themselves, and we believe that goal can only be achieved through thoughtful, sensitive editorial control.

If you have questions or comments about our policies or about a specific post, please send an e-mail to

Leave a Reply

Notify of