Region Ten prevails on Little High

The long real estate saga that has entangled the Little High Area Neighborhood Association (LHANA) and Region Ten, the public agency that provides services to mentally disabled people, came to what seems like a conclusion on October 26 when the City’s Board of Zoning Appeals ruled in favor of Region Ten. At issue was whether construction and redevelopment could continue apace at a Region Ten property at 1111-1113 Little High St. without the agency having to submit its plans to the Planning Commission for review and public hearing.

LHANA had contended that because the proposed use of the site was altered after a previous owner won City approval to develop a total of 40 apartments there, Region Ten’s plan required new review. Region Ten intends for the apartments to be low-income housing for their mainstreamed clients. LHANA maintained that, as such, The Mews (as the project is known) constituted adult assisted living.

On October 26, the Board of Zoning Appeals decided against LHANA.

The following day, LHANA President Mark Haskins struck a conciliatory note in a letter addressed to Region Ten’s interim director Caruso Brown. “One of our great concerns about The Mews has always been that it draws upon an unsuccessful public-housing project planning model which consistently results in the fragmentation of neighborhoods and the isolation of the very part of society it is intended to serve,” Haskins wrote. “Our dispute has been with Region Ten’s administration and planning of The Mews, however, not with the clients the project is intended to serve. Our neighborhood remains committed to welcoming all residents, regardless of disability."

Posted In:     News

Previous Post

Exploring campus black history

Next Post

Book covers wrongful imprisonment

Our comments system is designed to foster a lively debate of ideas, offer a forum for the exchange of ad hoc information, and solicit honest, respectful feedback about the work we do. We’re glad you’re participating. Here are a few simple rules to follow, which should be relatively straightforward.

1) Don’t call people names or accuse them of things you cannot support.
2) Don’t direct foul language, racial slurs, or offensive terms at other commenters or our staff.
3) Don’t use the discussion on our site for commercial (or shameless personal) promotion.

We reserve the right to remove posts and ban commenters who violate any of the rules listed above, or the spirit of the discussion. We’re trying to create a safe space for a wide range of people to express themselves, and we believe that goal can only be achieved through thoughtful, sensitive editorial control.

If you have questions or comments about our policies or about a specific post, please send an e-mail to

Leave a Reply

Notify of