Perriello scores a few more eco-points

Perriello scores a few more eco-points

He’s already earned some cred with the local food movement, and now our man in Washington, Tom Perriello, is looking to get the love from the Fifth District’s energy crowd. Read all about his Congressional earmark requests here (or, for the entire $151.2 million list, download the PDF from Perriello’s site). They include almost $2 million for electric plug-in vehicle technology, $4.4 million for landfill gas reclamation around the Southside, $750,000 for green job training in Danville, and $600,000 for an energy-efficient fire station in Drakes Branch.

"I do solemnly swear to bring home the green for green projects."

Of course, Congress still has to pass the appropriations bill to which these earmarks are attached. But Perriello no doubt wants you to know that he’s asking for the money, even as he attempts to reform the earmark process itself. That’s not to say every Perriello earmark is great for the planet: Expanding natural gas service in Rocky Mount, for example, is meant to create jobs, not save the world.

Meanwhile, the congressman has already secured nearly $3 million in federal money to weatherize local homes. This is good news. I’ve watched energy-efficiency experts over the past few years practically begging people to make the investment in tighter houses, and though that investment is inarguably a smart one, a lot of people just don’t have the cash to do it. When you consider that individual homeowners can get up to $6,500 through this program, you can see how such sums are beyond the reach of vulnerable people—who, by the way, are rather more likely to live in drafty houses in the first place.

So far, I find Perriello pretty convincing on the enviro front, given that he’s a major party politician. He’s not exactly Wendell Berry, but he’s doing some good things. What do you all think?

Posted In:     Uncategorized

Previous Post

Virginia politics must be over-stimulated

Next Post


Our comments system is designed to foster a lively debate of ideas, offer a forum for the exchange of ad hoc information, and solicit honest, respectful feedback about the work we do. We’re glad you’re participating. Here are a few simple rules to follow, which should be relatively straightforward.

1) Don’t call people names or accuse them of things you cannot support.
2) Don’t direct foul language, racial slurs, or offensive terms at other commenters or our staff.
3) Don’t use the discussion on our site for commercial (or shameless personal) promotion.

We reserve the right to remove posts and ban commenters who violate any of the rules listed above, or the spirit of the discussion. We’re trying to create a safe space for a wide range of people to express themselves, and we believe that goal can only be achieved through thoughtful, sensitive editorial control.

If you have questions or comments about our policies or about a specific post, please send an e-mail to

Leave a Reply

Notify of