New Albemarle Supervisors likely to favor development

New Albemarle Supervisors likely to favor development

Election results in Albemarle County mean Republicans have gained much more control on the Board of Supervisors. With the victories of Duane Snow and Rodney Thomas, it’s likely that developers will get a markedly friendlier reception from the new board on matters of planning and zoning.

Rodney Thomas celebrates last night at the Republican victory party at Rivals, with fellow Republican Ken Boyd at his side. Photo by Sarah Oehl.

"It’s not that the previous board didn’t listen to [the business and development communities], but [now] what the business community wants they’ll get," says Jeff Werner of the Piedmont Environmental Council. He points to a number of land-use issues where this tendency might play out.

"What I’m very concerned about is Places 29 is going to be either scrapped or just completely watered down," he says. (The County Planning Commission just voted to endorse Places 29, a master plan for land use and transportation, on October 27, and the Board will take it up early next year.) Werner also expects that more land will be added to the county’s growth areas, including areas near Hollymead and NGIC and a parcel in Crozet owned by Will Yancey.

Werner also thinks that developers whose projects have already been approved may approach the new board to renegotiate proffers. "I’m worried that you’re going to see a lot of things developers have agreed to do be taken off the table in those renegotiations," he says.

In retiring supervisor Sally Thomas, Albemarle is losing a limited-growth independent who tilted Democratic. And defeated incumbent Democrat David Slutzky was known for proposing unusual and sometimes controversial plans meant to protect rural areas from growth.

Posted In:     Uncategorized

Previous Post

Many theories abound about when exactly Deeds lost the race

Next Post

Northern exposure

Our comments system is designed to foster a lively debate of ideas, offer a forum for the exchange of ad hoc information, and solicit honest, respectful feedback about the work we do. We’re glad you’re participating. Here are a few simple rules to follow, which should be relatively straightforward.

1) Don’t call people names or accuse them of things you cannot support.
2) Don’t direct foul language, racial slurs, or offensive terms at other commenters or our staff.
3) Don’t use the discussion on our site for commercial (or shameless personal) promotion.

We reserve the right to remove posts and ban commenters who violate any of the rules listed above, or the spirit of the discussion. We’re trying to create a safe space for a wide range of people to express themselves, and we believe that goal can only be achieved through thoughtful, sensitive editorial control.

If you have questions or comments about our policies or about a specific post, please send an e-mail to

Leave a Reply

Notify of