HOME | CONTACT | WRITE TO THE EDITOR | WORK AT C-VILLE
www.scps.virginia.edu/landingpages/bis/index.htm?utm_source=BIS_
 Quote

"Two words: homemade tortilla." -- C-VILLE Weekly writers

www.regionten.org/
jeffersontheater.com
www.bristles.com/
 
Final Countdown
by Jen Sorensen
by Jen Sorensen, October 14th, 2008 12:21am

Is there really anything more red than going to a Sarah Palin rally at a NASCAR speedway on the holiday celebrating the European conquistadors' arrival in the Americas? If there is, I don't want to know.

Palin, along with hubby Todd and country crooner Hank Williams, Jr., stopped in Richmond Monday afternoon, following a Monday morning appearance with McCain in Virginia Beach. When I heard that the event had been moved from the smaller Arthur Ashe Center to Richmond International Raceway due to overwhelming public interest, I wondered whether this might be Palin's answer to Obama's speech in Mile High Stadium. 

As soon as Mr. Slowpoke and I exited Rte. 64, we hit a two-mile long traffic jam stretching down Laburnum Ave., the way to the racetrack. After crawling along behind lots of large vehicles with McCain stickers, we decided to stow our car on a residential street and walk a mile and a half to the rally. It was, as Mr. Slowpoke put it, "a blue solution to a red problem." Apparently not everyone was trying to get to the rally; one guy yelled at us twice from his van: "Vote for change!"

Based on reports of highly-charged emotions at McCain-Palin rallies, we decided to go the undercover route, which involved acting vaguely like McCain supporters. This meant no giving a thumbs-up to the "vote for change" guy. It also meant feeling a bit sheepish as I passed through a largely African-American neighborhood on my way to Oppressor Fest '08.

As it turned out, the event was not held in the Raceway stadium, which would have been far too big, but in a small adjoining field. The bleachers could only hold a fraction of the crowd; by the time we arrived, which was well before Palin began speaking, there was no line to get in -- just hordes of people milling outside the official event space, barely able to see the stage, if at all. The arrangement felt somewhat disorganized; I'd assumed the move to the racetrack meant most people would be accommodated. (Both the Richmond Times-Dispatch and the AP estimated the crowd to be over 20,000.)

 

The Straight Talk Express with Sarah inside (I saw The Bun quickly float by above the tops of those cars)

 

 

 

Where I was standing, people also had trouble hearing Palin's speech. I was right in the middle of the group (the "deaf wingnuts" as Wonkette called them, perhaps unfairly -- they were wingnuts, but not deaf) that began chanting "LOU-DER! LOU-DER!" to get the volume turned up. Palin assumed the chanters were haters and interrupted her speech to say "I hope those protesters have the courage and honor to give veterans thanks for their right to protest." Several supporters around me were clearly exasperated. "Is McCain too cheap to buy a good mic?" one guy wisecracked. Finally someone cranked up the PA system, and the crowd cheered.

Speaking of the crowd, no surprises there. It was overwhelmingly white; I saw maybe a handful of African-Americans. You had your standard Republican mix of mustachioed tough guys, button-down businessmen, soccer moms, and older folks.

Palin's speech seemed fairly boilerplate, full of stuff you've heard before. It was inane in a (relatively) normal way, instead of the way that gins up fits of rage. There was, of course, a "DRILL BABY DRILL!" moment. The biggest crowd-pleaser of the afternoon was the Redskins jersey-wearing Hank Williams, Jr. who sang a ridiculous ditty that included lines about "the left-wing liberal media" and Palin being a "good-looking dish."

Here are a few McCain-Palin supporters bearing signage:

 

No change for this kid!

 

His hat reads "Obama, Yes We Can... STOP HIM!" 

 

Okay then.

 

That Palin is a dingdong?

 

There were at least a few in attendance, however, who were not entirely down with the program:

 

A lone protester braves it.

 

Not keeping it subtle.

 

So the rally was not the blood-and-thunder affair I'd anticipated. In a way, I found it underwhelming -- though that may have been due to where I was standing. It also didn't seem quite as huge to me as the news reports are saying, but I'll take their word for it.

The undercover mission concluded with this delicious chicken BBQ sandwich from the Famous Dave's stall.

My reward.

 

Comments
Palin has no right to ask if we really know Obama. His record has already been subjected to intense scrutiny by the electorate, by Clinton as well as by McCain for nearly two years. Palin, on the other hand, is a complete neophyte who burst onto the national scene a mere six weeks ago. Her enthusiastic reception by social conservatives and less educated Republicans is alarming in light of her lack of preparation for national office. Her meteoric rise to fame marks the abandonment of political process for celebrity worship. Here is a woman whose pregnant teenage daughter is about to marry a foul-mouthed drug user while Palin is held up as an all-American mom, whose secessionist husband joined her in abuse of official power while she is held up as a paragon of patriotism, whose ignorance of history and law is looked upon as irrelevant and refreshing. How can this suspension of disbelief last longer than the length of a bad movie? Whether or not her candidacy is successful we must ask how this pretender has been promoted so effectively by the cynical McCain campaign managers. The future of this nation is at stake and too many of our fellow citizens cannot see the danger in her potential rise to the highest office in the land. It is truly frightening.
jefflz October 14th, 2008 02:12am
That was too funny. McCain/Palin is the poilitical equivilent of Dumb and Dumber. I honestly don't know any one with an ounce of intelligence and who is void of latent or overt racisim who can make the case of selecting them over Obama/Biden. Either way this election will not even be close, Sen. obama will beat him by a large margin.
chris October 14th, 2008 02:28am
Sneaking behind enemy lines like this can get you killed. Especially where social conservatives are concerned. A gutsy move, to be sure!

I'm so sick of hearing Republican rants about liberal media bias.

Blah, blah blah. We've heard it all before. It is an indirect way of saying "If you support non-Republicans it is because you haven't heard the *real* truth about them because the media has suppressed it." In other words, it is a conspiracy theory that accuses non-Republicans of ignorance. But, at the same time, many of these same people want to replace teaching evolution in schools with creationism...
Ben Davis October 14th, 2008 09:18am
Sheesh...for a second here I thought I was on Bizarro Red State.

As an allegedly social conservative (although in my workplace I'm usually called "the liberal"--which is frightening in its own right), I can say that I'm vaguely insulted by the implication that an Obama supporter need fear for their life at a Palin event. Indeed, I would hope that I would not need fear being rent limb from limb if I wore a McCain-Palin T-shirt to an Obama rally. If we are to believe that either is the case, then weep for our Republic as it won't be together much longer. Last time people had to worry about being forcibly assaulted for their political views (and it being accepted as "mainstream" political dissent), I believe we had a little discussion across four Aprils--and I'm seeing some disturbing similarities between the letters/speeches then and the comment sections here and elsewhere. "Those people" are Americans too and, no matter who wins, we're all going to have to pull together to get through the current situation or, to paraphrase Ben Franklin, we're going to hang apart.

As a middle of the road independent, I'm afraid that I see media bias on both sides depending on the channel. (Which is why I read Jen and like her cartoons--she's at least honest about where she stands.) So, yes, the Republicans have a point about some of the slant--but then again, A. that's why there's Fox News / talk radio and B. how many people do _you_ know who actually watch the nightly news anymore? In short, "media bias" is a wash...ol' Dubya (stop hissing!) won two elections despite of it, so I think it's about time both sides stopped crying about it.

What scares me is that, yes, out of the four candidates we only have two with demonstrable experience (neither of whom I'd trust with the Presidency), a leftist, and a right wing nutjob governor. Regardless of party affiliation, that should scare the crap out of all of us--but instead we are busy pointing fingers, polarizing ourselves into two camps that don't talk to one another, and merrily arguing about Palin / Obama's personal life and past acquaintances rather than saying, "Um, excuse us, but WHAT THE *bleep*?" to our political class. In short, the reason there's a suspension of disbelief is because we the electorate don't demand any better--on either side.
James October 14th, 2008 11:22am
James,

A real independent would never claim that "ol' Dubya" won in 2000. As you know perfectly well, he became President because of the Supreme Court ruling in Bush v. Gore.
Matt October 14th, 2008 12:59pm
My apologies, James. My experience with social conservatives has been almost totally negative, so please forgive me for painting with an overly-broad brush.
Ben Davis October 14th, 2008 02:00pm
Ben and James: While I was a little anxious at first given last week's news reports of angry rally attendees, I would emphasize that the Richmond audience seemed jovial rather than thuggish, and I did not feel unsafe. Most people around me seemed more preoccupied with getting a photo of Sarah's beehive than anything.
Jen Sorensen October 14th, 2008 02:21pm
Some of your photos remind me of Fred Phelps' bunch in Topeka, KS. I used to live there and was surprised and disgusted when I first saw them.
Ben Davis October 14th, 2008 02:35pm
Matt--So remind me again where the Supreme Court ruled that George Bush was President of the United States? Because I must have missed that part in the majority opinion. Or how the NYT's (hardly that bastion of conservative opinion) independent count still showed the man winning by 500 votes. As I've said recently to the people who are already pointing to the ACORN complaints as reasons to delegitimize a potential Obama Presidency, once the Electoral College and Congress certifies someone was President, they're President. Especially when Gore himself refused to file a complaint in the Senate in conjunction with the House Dems. However, I'm not going to lose any sleep if you think that makes me not a "real independent"--you've sorta volunteered as exhibit A for my discussion of partisanship.

Enough of this BS--if the electoral college and Congress certifies someone as the Chief Executive we need to rally, not spend the next eight years muttering about how an election was "stolen." This is why I hope (as I suspect is going to happen) Obama has an electoral landslide--so there's no question or muttering this time and we can at least head in _some_ direction in this country rather than gnawing at our own partisan entrails.

Ben--Enh, as someone who has the misfortune of seeing the Phelps about two or three times a month, I don't think these guys are quite as crazy. They're simply people using that First Amendment thing creatively, just like I've seen at Obama rallies. Suffice to say the Phelps are not my favorite people, and I think the only reason they're able to ever get anything in Topeka is the high concentration of lawyers in that family. In my opinion they're going to eventually protest at the wrong funeral (I notice they studiously avoid Special Forces services) and end up being a headline--but that could just be wishful thinking.

I am sorry that your only exposure to social conservatives was a negative one, and believe me when I have no problem seeing that. For people who want the government out of their lives some social conservatives seem to be quite ready to tell everyone else how to live their own.
James October 14th, 2008 05:26pm
What a great piece of reporting, and photography!Way better than any other coverage I've read. Thanks for your hard work there.
scavenger October 15th, 2008 04:45pm
Here's a great opinion piece in the NY Times on Sarah Palin: http://tinyurl.com/4n2xza

James: I'm afraid my negative exposure to social conservatives has been a frequent occurrence. I can name far more negative experiences with conservatives of all stripes than I can positive experiences. I have at least one in my immediate family that I just can't even stand to be around because she is constantly on the attack. It as if everything she sees and hears is another excuse for her to belittle and lecture everyone around her. To the point of where even lifelong friends no longer want to be around her. And I also work with quite a few hardcore social conservatives that are very belligerent about it. So it has been more than a single occasion.
Ben Davis October 15th, 2008 10:10pm
Have your say
*
*
*
Your comment will be displayed after it has been reviewed by the blog author. Please refer to our comments policy if you have any questions, or email editor@c-ville.com.
www.c-ville.com/index.php?cat=1991712083826863&ShowArticl
www.facebook.com/pages/Charlottesville-VA/jean-theory/1274017519
c-ville.com/index.php?cat=1990602080504511
www.secondstreetgallery.org
click on the day to see the events for that day
 Prev   Sep 2010  Next  
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
  1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30  
 
event: pick your type
 
music: pick your venue
 
dining: pick your cuisine
 
www.nestrealtygroup.com/
www.omnihotels.com/FindAHotel/Charlottesville/Dining.aspx
Top Ads
Circulation VerifiedCopyright © 2010, Portico Publications
Copyright Info | Portico Corporate
Powered by PLANet w3 CMS Content Management System
PLANet Systems Group 2010