HOME | CONTACT | WRITE TO THE EDITOR | WORK AT C-VILLE
www.scps.virginia.edu/communityscholar/
 Quote

"Two words: homemade tortilla." -- C-VILLE Weekly writers

www.cvillemedresearch.com
jeffersontheater.com
www.bristles.com/
This Just In
by C-VILLE Writers
by Jayson Whitehead, July 8th, 2008 03:06pm
Just days after our war-mongering president came to Monticello, a commission established to address over-reaching like his has released its recommendations today. Impaneled by UVA's Miller Center in February 2007 and helmed by two former secretaries of state, James A. Baker III and Warren Christopher, the National War Powers Commission concluded that the War Powers Resolution of 1973 has failed to promote cooperation between the federal and executive branches of government and recommended that Congress pass a new statute—the War Powers Consultation Act of 2009—that would establish a clear process on decisions to go to war.
 
Specifically, the War Powers Act of 2009 would mandate that the president consult with Congress before deploying U.S. troops into “significant armed conflict,” define exactly what would be considered “significant armed conflicts,” and calls on Congress to vote up or down on significant armed conflicts within 30 days.

“This statute does not attempt to resolve the constitutional questions that have dominated the debate over the war powers, and does not prejudice the president or Congress their right or ability to assert their respective constitutional war powers,” said Baker, an advisor to Dubya on the Iraq War. “What we aim to do with this statute is to create a process that will encourage the two branches to cooperate and consult in a way that is both practical and true to the spirit of the Constitution.”


A war powers commission helmed by James Baker made its recommendations today.
Comments
"our war-mongering president came to Monticello"? Is that somehow supposed to represent journalistic nuetrality?!?
Just Wondering.
Giovanni July 8th, 2008 05:22pm
"war mongering"

Do the math we lost millions of people in WWII bringing peace to Europe the middle east and the pacific for 60 years .

If we can bring lasting paece to the middle east for 6000 lives or less than 1% of previous wars then it is worth every penny.

When Al queda hits I hope the naysayers are the ones who lose the loved ones so they can get a better understanding of the world.
wwII vet July 8th, 2008 09:00pm
Hey WWII Vet,
That part of the earth has been at war since we humans crawled out of the primordial ooze and our gills fell off. To think that our "Coalition Of the Willing" will make its mark is quite optimistic. Every few years someone decides to stake their claim (Russia, Brits, America) to that part of the world and they eventually back out.

Stop falling into that classic patriotic model, the "love it or leave it" meets "nuke 'em all" ethos. We love that you defended our freedom in the hedgerows, but WWI built WWII. Our need for oil and political associations built Al Queda.
dank fu July 9th, 2008 07:58am
Have your say
*
*
*
Your comment will be displayed after it has been reviewed by the blog author. Please refer to our comments policy if you have any questions, or email editor@c-ville.com.
www.c-ville.com/index.php?cat=1991712083826863&ShowArticl
www.facebook.com/pages/Charlottesville-VA/jean-theory/1274017519
petitbebe.com/
www.secondstreetgallery.org
click on the day to see the events for that day
 Prev   Sep 2010  Next  
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
  1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30  
 
event: pick your type
 
music: pick your venue
 
dining: pick your cuisine
 
www.nestrealtygroup.com/
www.eagleslandingva.com
Top Ads
Circulation VerifiedCopyright © 2010, Portico Publications
Copyright Info | Portico Corporate
Powered by PLANet w3 CMS Content Management System
PLANet Systems Group 2010