HOME | CONTACT | WRITE TO THE EDITOR | WORK AT C-VILLE
www.nycshuttle.com/schedule.php
 
Issue #21.20 :: 05/19/2009 - 05/25/2009
“No” in Belmont, “slow” on the Mall

BY RESTAURANTARAMA

Plans for a new Creole restaurant in Belmont were quashed last week when the City Planning Commission denied Andrew Ewell and Hannah Pittard’s request to rezone their property at 814 Hinton Ave. from residential to commercial. The 4-2 vote came though the property is next door to Belmont Bar-B-Que and mere yards away from the other restaurants on Hinton Avenue, and it came though Ewell and Pittard offered three proffers: a buffer, a no-music venue stipulation, and a restaurant-only use permit. Many Belmont residents attended the meeting to complain about the noise, traffic and parking issues another commercial property might contribute, and Commissioner Genevieve Keller, who voted No, said that Belmont’s commercial area “has reached capacity.”

Three’s company: Left to right, Todd Howard, owner, Michael Tsai, chef, and Dave Sullivan, general manager, at Escafe, where lunch plans are still stymied by the final touches of Mall rebricking.

This is all very unfortunate for us as we’ve been lamenting the lack of good gumbo since ZydeCo closed on the Corner, so we truly hope Ewell and Pittard bring their restaurant idea to fruition somewhere. (By the way, A and H, there are quite a few houses that have been sitting for sale in Restaurantarama’s neighborhood for months and months just sucking the value out of our own house with each passing day—we’d be glad to help broker a deal.) Also, we sincerely hope that if Ewell tries to sell his property, he finds a residential buyer who really likes the smell of smoked meat in the morning.

On another losing end of dealings with the city is Escafé. While we all celebrate the successful completion of the rebricking project, Escafé owner Todd Howard listens to the continued jackhammering outside his establishment and stews about when he’ll finally be able to reopen for lunch and seat people in his patio area. See, the rebricking project is not quite done after all. When we spoke to Howard two weeks ago, he thought he’d be open for the midday meal by the end of May, but now it looks more like June. After purchasing the restaurant in October with some silent partners, Howard says he’s really eager to get lunch going “to become a community commodity again.”

Restaurantarama for one is really eager to see what Escafé’s new head chef and 2008 Le Cordon Bleu graduate Michael Tsai will do with E’s familiar lunch and dinner staples such as meatloaf and fried chicken. “I may smoke it and add house-made pear mustard or something,” says Tsai, who’s bringing haute French training derived from both his Cordon Bleu class work and a post-graduate stage at Paris’s Maison Blanche to bear on Escafé’s quirky kitchen.

Tsai, who graduated from UVA with dual degrees in Foreign Affairs and East Asian Studies in 2005, worked for Charlottesville’s International Rescue Committee through the Americorps VISTA program before deciding that the world of cooking was calling. It was at the IRC that Tsai first met Howard. The two later worked together catering and cooking for Bill Curtis at Tastings and the Court Square Tavern, and they eventually fell in love over the hot stoves. Tsai says the relationship contributed to the kind of synchronization that only the best kitchen teams seem to have: “We always knew each other’s next move.”

That kind of harmony will likely serve the two well now that they’re reunited at Escafé, though only professionally. Incidentally, Howard also once dated Escafé’s general manager, David Sullivan. As for whether working with an ex-boyfriend is awkward, Tsai says, no, but he jokes: “People tell us we should rename the place “Ex-café.”

 
Comments
I love the logic- we ruined one residential property by allowing a restaurant next door, we ruined it for the eople behind them, so lets go ahead and do it for several more houses. Maybe if the city weren't allowing restaurants in conflict with the current code, the ones on the downtown mall wouldn;t be floundering so badly. Sorry, i am not interested in ruining the efforts of a lot of owner occupied houses just so the city can keep going in its stupid path of destruction. Those businesses had their chance years ago, when it wasn't 'hip' to be there. They didn't have the courage. Frankly, Charlottesville doesn't need one more cliched half baked mediocre kischy place that will collapse in a year.
TortfeezerMay 19th, 2009 12:40am
hannah & andrew were so rude & unpleasant (well, mostly just hannah) to customers at crush, as well as to its owner, that i'm glad they didn't get their zoning. when you consider the bad business decisions they made there, the city is really just nipping their proposed failure in the bud.
orchidMay 19th, 2009 12:30pm
I'd like to encourage keeping the discussion to zoning matters and the question of commercial/residential boundaries implicit in Ewell and Pittard's application. Is there really any need in this discussion for unsubstantiated and potentially hurtful personal claims?
Cathy HardingMay 19th, 2009 02:19pm
I'de like to know what I posted that did not pertain directly to the subject of zoning and the commercial/residential district Kathy Harding. If the current zoning guidelines had been followed to begin with, the problems from late night noise to vandalism, traffic, and parking wouldn't be an issue. Even the owner of Mas Tapas has been open about what he was required to do, versus what some of our more 'problematic' establishments were required to do, and he isn;t too pleased about it. And yes, I ahve the right to post my opinion on the business plan as well, as it too, is part of what is being used to get the rezoning passed. There isn't anything original, unique, or special about building another restaurant in Charlottesville, much less an attempt at a 'trendy' one where the food is less important than being seen there. There are dozen of those flops downtown right now. By the way, some of the business owners have already admitted they can't make it without their late night noise and bars, so why do you think one that doesn't offer that has a chance?
TortfeezerMay 19th, 2009 04:39pm
Dear Tortfeezer: I was not alluding to your comment. Keep on reading! Thanks.
Cathy HardingMay 19th, 2009 05:43pm
Is this piece intended to even resemble real news? Or just be an unabashedly opinionated, naive, spare-no-expenses plug? Why are the Belmont residents who turned out to complain about the noise rendered as whiny naysayers? Maybe they're not lamenting "the lack of good gumbo" but rather the loss of peace and quiet. If the proposers of this intended restaurant really had the intention and tenacity to carry their project through to completion, they'd consider opening in one of the many abandoned commercial storefronts currently peppering the community, rather than insisting upon riding the Belmont wave into the ground. I'm a foodie myself, but there's little that irritates me more than people who think they have the "right" to open a business just because it sounds cool.
virginianativeMay 19th, 2009 08:19pm
Classic example of the abusive use of "zoning" to safeguard resident's expectations of what their neighborhood should be like. Too bad the owners of the property can't decide how to best use their property because other people apparently made that decision for them. Zoning is an antiquated and often abused power of the nanny state.
JRMay 20th, 2009 10:04am
These kids acted in a particularly nervy fashion-- buying a residentially zoned property next to a commercially zoned one, and then using that rationale to try and take down the rest of the block. Whether intentioned or not, it shows a stunning lack of foresight and blindness to the Big Picture of zoning. There are plenty of commercially zoned properties they could have picked from, but no, it was important for them to latch onto the coattails of Belmont Chic. The attitude that anyone that doesn't agree with your great idea is "uncool" is hipsterism at it's most laughable. I'm particularly disturbed by some of the members of the Planning Commission who would use Mixed Use zoning as a weapon against residential neighborhoods. They are very eager to force their ideology at the expense of other neighborhoods besides their own. And Cathy, respectfully, I think that Orchid's comment, though personal, does have some pertinence in that Charlottesville is a VERY small town. "As ye sow" is something that pops up in Cville on a regular basis, especially in the close-knit food world. That said, unlike Orchid, I've never met these people personally, only know them through their PC appearance and mutual friends and acquaintances. YMMV, VaChef
In the Food BizMay 20th, 2009 01:45pm
WTF is a "foodie"??
Huh?May 20th, 2009 05:04pm
JR:Thanks for your typical right wing view of the world so easily identified by the term ' nanny state.' There is nothing antiquated or outdated by zoning, and it is in place to protect not just residents, but businesses as well. It isn't just residents who are complaining, but other business people. No doubt, you would be fine if I started a landfill right behind your house, and let your children deal with snakes and play on contaminated ground as chemicals leaked off of my property. After all, its my property and I have the right to do with it what I want, right? I should be able to profit off your discomfort. One reason why the applicants are pushing for rezoning is because others felt just like you, and really damaged the value of their residential property. Though I can have some compassion, the fact is, the current zoning was in place before the poperty in question was bought, and the problem businesses unhappy with the rules were started. Perhaps if this was on their mind, they should have bought one of the residential properties already existing on land zoned commercial. As for the restaurants, if they really wanted to be bars and nightclubs, there were other commercial areas not so close to residences already available. Right now, the attitude seems to be the residents are supposed to do without sleep,parking, and security so a few business models can succeed where they should have never been allowed to begin with.
TortFeezerMay 20th, 2009 07:11pm
sorry, cathy, i'll try to stick to zoning. for example, the situation has been twisted so that people like JR feel sympathetic towards these poor kids who can't do anything with their house because of zoning rules. but hannah & andrew have been trying to own a business in belmont for a while. first they were going to buy crush but backed out; then they were going to open a pool hall under bel rio but that fell through. so it's not a situation of them trying to find a use for their house and being stymied--it's would-be entrepreneurs trying to ride the wave of belmont's popularity any way they can.
orchidMay 21st, 2009 09:47am
orchid: You forgot to mention the two week attempt with the vintage shop. Or was that just their friends? I love how once again business is supposed to be subsidized at the expense of everyone else. Especially business attempts without a real plan.
TortFeezerMay 21st, 2009 12:04pm
Ha! That's funny. I've (seriously) never been called right wing before but I'm happy to be sullied with such an epithet when it comes to zoning. The problem with zoning is that the intention was originally to protect property owners from harmful land uses (i.e. landfills) but what it has become is a tool for neighborhoods to stymie productive uses of property and to enforce exclusionary demographics. Whether these guys were riding some wave of popularity in Belmont seems irrelevant to me. They were going to make productive use of their property that did not impose any significant harm on the residents of that neighborhood.
JRMay 21st, 2009 01:27pm
JR: You are welcome. Perhaps you might want to consider your word choice carefully. Noise pollution is a well documented harmful form of pollution, associated with all sorts of harmful side effects, from decreased learning, to significantly increased stress levels. These effects are not harmless, and when they spill over several blocks, then yes, it is a major issue. Not getting sleep night after night due to the noise is also well documented as harmful to your health. Within a few days you act as if you are severely intoxicated.. I know one couple that was forced to sell and move because of the continuous lack of sleep due to the spoiled noisy renters in two houses who said " We want to party dude' every night until 4 AM. Fortunately 3 of them have been chucked by their landlords. Why should anyone be forced to sell because a couple of businesses want to create bars and nightclubs in the middle of a residential community? If the restaurants were all so harmless, why then are the applicants themselves saying that their home has been made far less comfortable as a residence due to the BBQ place next door from the smell of meat and the AC unit? Lets move onto productive. Just how productive are these two? How many flopped business attempts do they have already? More than one. My lord, do these people even HAVE an real restaurant experience????? Lets also consider that other businesses in the spot have already admitted they can't survive without the late night alcohol loud crowd. There is nothing productive about opening a highly questionable business type in a saturated market. See, that's where you logic falls flat JR. 1) It isn't harmless 2) It isn't insignificant 3) It isn't productive. Seriously? You don't want to accept that, because yo obviously aren't next to it being kept up all night by it, when you have to get up at 6 AM to go to work. You aren't having to send thousands n fences to keep the debris from ending up in your yard.
TortFeezerMay 21st, 2009 03:24pm
I would have to agree with JR on this. Whether you (or the zoning board) likes their business idea or not seems irrelevant. Your view of their previous business ideas / plans also seems irrelevant. The story is more around whether or not Belmont wants to promote additional economic activity within that area. Is it good for Belmont collectively (not just the few who live within 100 yards of the restaurants) or bad? Does it increase the property value and attractiveness of Belmont in the long run? It seems everyone is caught up in the politics of who these entrepreneurs are vs. the larger story of the long term benefits of business development in that neighborhood. By the way - if you think that mixed-use zoning and businesses have a future in Belmont - then the board should have given them approval. If their business idea stinks - then they'll fail and somone else will buy the property and have an opportunity of launching something successful.
BonesMay 21st, 2009 04:36pm
Bones: I see you are one of those who believes that if every business or business plan doesn't get its way, then all businesses are suddenly threatened and that is it doesn't represent a mixed use. Yet you, like everyone else supposedly defending business, never seem to have any real definable arguments, you just repeat the same old, tired mantra about how business brings so much. Shall we take a drive through Southside Richmond? Lots of businesses, yet its a dirty crime ridden wasteland. Why is that, when business is supposed to do 'so much'? Please tell us how limiting a monolithic disruptive business culture in any way conflicts with 'mixed use'? 7 Restaurants on one corner reflects mixed use? That is not mixed use. There are other properties currently available in Belmont for commercial development without the need to rezone. There are currently businesses in operating in Belmont, many of whom have been around for a LONG time like Fitzgerald Tire, in the current zoning boundaries, with no complaints and conflicts from the residents. Nor do they appear to be going out of business anytime soon. How about Browns? Birkhead Signs? The Yoga Studio? The Vocal Institute? Whats more these businesses actually provide consistent, career oriented jobs with benefits, not transient part time jobs. I can think of several business that would do beautifully in Belmont, provide good jobs, and fit the current zoning. Ultimately, business owners go into business for themselves, to make money. Expecting local residents to take a lower standard of living to subsidize that is not appropriate unless the owners intend to share their profits with them.
TortFeezerMay 22nd, 2009 10:35am
Sorry, adendum; Bones: The people who have been disrupted by the restaurant mania is not just within a hundred yards. Complaints come in from several blocks around it. One of the most memorable nights was Taza's Oyster fest, where people were awakened several blocks away by the music. This is NOT an immediate neighbor issue. This is an entire sector issue. These 'harmless' businesses are taking over several blocks with their disruptions.
TortFeezerMay 22nd, 2009 10:39am
Tort: Ahhh....You got me! Those are great arguments. Completely fair and balanced just like Fox News. My bad. Guess I have no choice but to drown my sorrows by heading to Mas around midnight, drinking heavily and screaming "I Love Capitalism" at the top of my lungs until the neighbors wake up. Hey - why don't you join me?? Beers are on me.
BonesMay 22nd, 2009 02:03pm
Bones: how is being concerned about noise violations in a residential neighborhood at all analogous to Fox News? With irrelevant arguments like that, this conversation is going to devolve into absurdity fast. Maybe you've been lucky enough to never deal with unwanted noise (maybe restaurant noise wouldn't bother you, but certainly something would, especially if it was at a time when you wanted to hear yourself think or get some sleep). It's one of the fastest routes to insanity, especially when it's night after night. I fail to see how yet another restaurant will contribute positively to that neighborhood--except if it's to drive housing prices up further. It's so great that there's no affordable housing in Cville, and that the one area that used to be affordable for working class folks is now being infiltrated with yoga studios and yuppies. That's a fantastic addition to the neighborhood; even better is when this ill-conceived business fails in a year, leaving yet another foreclosed property for the banks to buy up.
virginianativeMay 22nd, 2009 11:44pm
Bones, thanks for the sarcasm. Talk about Faux news style. This is exaclty why the affected residents are opposed to the re-zoning; anytime a discussion comes up about possible problems, they are brushed off as if they are simply complainers, or opposed to business, and its done sarcastically. You had an opportunity to define just what you felt mixed use was, and chose to answer with a smarty pants response. The concerns are real, and they are legit. The documentation on the negative affects of noise pollution - which is the biggest problem - is extstentive. It has a downward pressure on residential property values, especially at the volumes being used by a number of the establishments. If the surrounding property owners are expected to contribute through a loss in their capital investments for the establishments, then they should receive a share of the profits. THAT is capitalism, and economics at the core. Sorry if that and defining mixed use seem to much for you. As for Mas? The owner is also against the rezoning.
TortfeezerMay 23rd, 2009 10:29am
Just another case of someone buying lower priced residential property and attempting to convert it to higher priced commercial property. Who pays? The residential owners who have a right to expect and maintain their neighborhood.
ArtMay 23rd, 2009 12:10pm
Just out of curiosity, were any of these people able to sleep when gang-bangers were running up and down the streets? When people were afraid to cross Belmont Bridge? Have we forgotten what Belmont was before the "yuppies" and "villainous business owners" invested their money and time into the neighborhood, to bring people with money and manners into the area? I understand that it may be difficult for some, but any resident who has come into my business with a noise complaint has had their concerns heard and come to a comfortable resolution. If you have a problem, please voice it at the business and not anonymously on some blog. BTW, if you think a creole restaurant is bad, just imagine what they can do with their current zoning. They could just turn it into another dump boarding house for mexican illegals and see how much the neighborhood likes THAT.
employedinbelmontMay 31st, 2009 01:03am
Have your say
*
*
*
Your comment will be displayed after it has been reviewed by our editors. Please refer to our comments policy if you have any questions, or email editor@c-ville.com.
Comments (22)

C-VILLE site search by Charlottesville's Best News and Entertainment
http://www.surveymonkey.com/s/7F3K73S
www.charlottesvilledermatology.com/
www.facebook.com/pages/Charlottesville-VA/jean-theory/1274017519
c-ville.com/index.php?cat=1990602080504511
doubletree1.hilton.com
www.charlottesvilledermatology.com/
www.undertheroof.com/
www.eagleslandingva.com
www.charlottesvillepavilion.com/fridaysafterfive/
Circulation VerifiedCopyright © 2010, Portico Publications
Copyright Info | Portico Corporate
Powered by PLANet w3 CMS Content Management System
PLANet Systems Group 2010