HOME | CONTACT | WRITE TO THE EDITOR | WORK AT C-VILLE
Riverbend Condos
Issue #23.21 :: 05/24/2011 - 05/30/2011
How Patricia Kluge's vineyard reached beyond its means

Wine in the time of poverty

BY J. TOBIAS BEARD

In Hemingway's The Sun Also Rises, one character asks another how he went bankrupt. "Gradually," he says, "then suddenly."* 

Kluge strolls the estate with her third husband, Bill Moses. 

In 2002, the Kluge Estate New World Red entered the world in an ebony trimmed wooden box designed by David Albert Charles Armstrong-Jones, a.k.a. Viscount Linley, son of Princess Margaret, nephew of the Queen and 14th in line for the British throne. There were only 289 of these beauties made, signed by the winemaker, naturally, but also by the winery owner, who saw fit to slap an embossed profile of her swollen head on every bottle. She also slapped a $495 price tag on the wine, by far the highest price we’re ever likely to see on a wine from Virginia.

Eight years later Kluge Estate Winery & Vineyard would be moribund, ending not with a bang, but with a fire sale. The New World Red, having long ago lost its royal trappings, would end its life being sold for $10.96 at a Downtown wine shop. Instead of being displayed in a custom case, customers were carrying it off by the caseload.

Gold digger hall of fame

“I envisioned all this a long time ago,” Patricia Kluge told a Los Angeles Times reporter in 1990. “I never had any doubt that I was going to be a great lady and do what I wanted to do. Not for a minute.”

Patricia Kluge and her billionaire second husband, John, in 1987.

Patricia Kluge achieved Great Ladyhood via a well-worn path: Take your clothes off and then divorce well. In 1981, the 32-year-old Brit and former professional naked-person married 66-year-old German immigrant and self-made man, John Werner Kluge, who in 1989 became the richest man in America, worth $5.2 billion. One year later, the marriage was over.

In 1990, the dissolution of Donald and Ivana Trump’s ill-fated union was grabbing all the headlines, but the Kluge divorce was the one that had everybody talking. “A divorce made in heaven” the New York Times called it, owing to the fact that Patricia Kluge reportedly received the interest on $1 billion per year, which if calculated at 8 percent, comes out to $80 million a year, or $1.5 million a week, plus a 23,500-square-foot, 45-room monument to excess called Albemarle House.

But, if she wanted to fulfill her destiny and become a Great Lady, she needed to be someone else, someone not defined by her ex-husband’s wealth. She needed an occupation, something that would rid her of her reputation as nothing but a strumpet-turned-gold digger extraordinaire.

Living in Charlottesville, right around the bend from the remains of the Ur-Charlottesvillian, the answer must have seemed obvious. What would Thomas Jefferson Do?

She decided she was going to make a world-class wine right here in Virginia.

Look on my works, Ye Snarky, and despair

“It would have been fun to grow a regional wine,” Kluge told the Daily Progress in 2006, “but I told myself it would be nice to grow a wine that is well-received elsewhere.”

Kluge Estate Winery & Vineyard was founded in 1999, and you could tell that Patricia was serious about her new occupation because she started wearing a Barbour jacket and Wellies in photographs instead of Chanel. Gone was the glamorous and sultry society woman; in her place was a self-described “working girl” who told W Magazine that she regularly got up at four in the morning to work the harvest. “It’s hard work,” she said, but “it’s also very romantic.”

The hiring of Michel Rolland, the world’s most famous wine consultant, was the single greatest sign that Kluge Estate was different from any Virginia winery that had come before it.

The Kluge Estate Winery & Vineyard was built according to what seems to be Patricia Kluge’s philosophy of life: If you make it look great, people will believe it is great. To this end, she hired famous architect David Easton to design her tasting room (he was also responsible for Albemarle House), big name New York City chefs Dan Shannon and Serge Torres to make snacks to accompany the wine, and the co-owner of Dean & DeLuca, Tom Thornton, to oversee the whole gustatory operation, which in 2004 expanded to include Fuel, the purveyor of haute cuisine/gasoline that Mrs. Kluge planned to turn into a national McLuxury franchise.

But the single greatest sign that Kluge Estate was different from any Virginia winery that had come before it was the hiring of Michel Rolland.

At 67, Rolland is the world’s most famous wine consultant. He literally flies around the world giving winemakers advice, for which he’s paid as much as $1 million per client.

The wine world is fairly strictly divided between those who love Rolland and those who feel he is Satan incarnate, hell-bent on destroying wine. Rolland promotes a modern, slick style of wine that critics say does away with any sense of individuality, yet all but guarantees that the wine will get big scores and sell like the latest iPhone.

“Until I was brought here,” Rolland said during a talk at Piedmont Virginia Community College in 2006, “no one had imagined making world-class wines in Virginia.” While this is certainly not true (Barboursville, for instance, which is owned by the biggest winemaking family in Italy, had the same vision 30 years earlier), it is true that in 2006 Patricia Kluge’s winery was poised to take Virginia wine to new, Napa-esque heights. They were doing all the things that wineries do to convince consumers that they’re a success: winning medals, garnering glowing write-ups in glossy magazines, and telling everyone who would listen that they were going to be one of the best wineries in the world.

“Our success,” Kluge said in W Magazine in 2003, “will affect the other winemakers. They know that Virginia has the potential to be a major wine region, but they need someone to be a catalyst, to show the world what we can do.”

How not to live on $1.5 million a week

Much later, when the news finally broke that the winery was bankrupt, Bill Moses, Mrs. Kluge’s third and current husband, blamed it on the economy—a “perfect storm” he called it. But although the global financial collapse probably didn’t help, it doesn’t deserve the brunt of the blame. In 2007, as the financial crisis began, the Virginia wine industry was entering a period of strong growth that continues today, with more new wineries being started after 2007 than in the 10 years prior.

The next Napa? Patricia Kluge was convinced that her winery would be a “catalyst” that would show the world what Virginia wines could do.

For Kluge Estate, 2007 was all about expansion. The previous year they’d started planting grapevines at a ridiculous pace, hoping to reach a final total of 300 acres, 10 times the size of the average Virginia winery. Total production had increased to around 30,000 cases a year, at the upper end for the state, with a goal of 50,000. All of this was being funded in part by a $34.8 million loan from Farm Credit of the Virginias.

But that was just the beginning. 2007 also saw the completion of the first house on a 511-acre gated community called Vineyard Estates. Twenty-three more homes were planned, custom-made for anyone capable of paying $6 to $23 million—the kicker being that each house would have access to vineyards, allowing the homeowner to be a mini-winemaker as well. Or, in essence, a mini-Patricia Kluge. She was franchising herself.

But not everything was peachy in Kluge world. In June of 2007, Fuel restaurant and gas station closed abruptly after firing numerous chefs and supposedly “hemorrhaging about $100,000 a month,” according to former general manager Ken Wooten. Wooten told C-VILLE that the restaurant paid a lot of money for “consultant chefs” who visited a few days a week, and for overpriced ingredients that rotted as tables went unfilled.

Two months later, Kluge Estate was sued in Albemarle County court for not paying a cleaning bill totaling $22,847. At the time, Kluge Estate spokesperson (and Patricia’s step-daughter) Kristin Moses Murray strongly denied that these two events indicated any kind of financial trouble at Kluge Estate.

There was one bigger big problem, however. The wine wasn’t selling. Where most local wineries were able to sell out the majority of each vintage to pay for the following one, the Kluge wine being shipped to stores was often several vintages old. One ex-employee described the warehouse as looking like the final scene of Raiders of the Lost Ark: row upon row of cases sitting forgotten, stretching as far as the eye could see. It’s not that the wine was bad. There were good people involved in making it after all, from consultants Michel Rolland and Laurent Champs (owner of high-end, cult Champagne house Vilmart), to accomplished sparkling winemaker Claude Thibaut (fired in 2005), red wine maker Charles Gendrot (also fired), and even local legend Gabriele Rausse. But there were two issues that kept it from selling: The owner’s name overshadowed the wine, and the wine cost way too much.

In 2008, Kluge Estate introduced a new sales manager, Mark Toepke, at a midday meeting at the Farm Shop over lunch and several bottles of Kluge sparkling wine. You could smell the desperation in the room. Toepke, who had previously been vice president of sales and operations for successful California producer Kendall–Jackson, had been brought in to reverse the flagging sales, and he had one simple recommendation: cut prices. And they did, bringing the price of their flagship wine, the New World Red, down from $50 to the vastly more realistic price of $24.99.

Rumors of an impending Kluge Estate bankruptcy started tiptoeing around the wine world at the beginning of 2008. That February, I was at the inaugural Virginia Wine Expo in Richmond when I heard two pieces of startling gossip. The first was that Kluge Estate had fired its primary winemaker, Charles Gendrot, and the second was that La Dame Kluge’s pride and joy was about to go belly up.

The rumor was that Gendrot’s firing was not pleasant (Gendrot wouldn’t talk to me then or now). Firing Gendrot made no sense, but he was by no means the first person Kluge had fired. Throw a rock in Charlottesville and you’ll hit someone who used to work for Kluge, and it’s almost guaranteed that person will be disgruntled.

The bankruptcy rumor seemed much more consequential. After several fruitless hours asking the same questions and getting the same answers, I talked to a friend of mine who for many years had actually run a successful winery. To protect his identity and make my job seem more important than it is, I’ll call him Mr. X.

“Look over my shoulder,” Mr. X said. “You see that guy behind me? That’s Todd Haymore, the state secretary of agriculture. If he even catches a whiff of what we’re talking about, we’re both in deep shit.”

“So, what’s going on?”

“Kluge’s toast. They’re going to declare bankruptcy any day now, but there’s no way anyone’s going to go on the record about it. In fact, I’m telling you not to write that story.”

“Why? If Kluge is going bankrupt it’s big news. Why shouldn’t I write about it?”

“Because,” Mr. X said, “if she goes under, it will be bad for all of us. Look, Kluge Estate is the biggest name in Virginia wine. Not the best, or the most important, but the most famous. Kluge is the name they know in L.A. and New York. And what will they say in New York if Kluge goes bankrupt? They’ll say, ‘If Patricia Kluge, with all her money, can’t make great wine in Virginia, who can?’”

Yes, we have no financial problems

In early October of 2009, The Kluge Estate Winery & Vineyard celebrated its 10th anniversary, and so Patricia Kluge donned her nifty winemaker costume—polo shirt, jeans and green rubber boots—and went out to help shovel manure.

Sitting down for an interview with The Daily Progress, Kluge and Moses tried desperately to give the impression that everything was O.K. Their wines were currently being sold in 15 states, Kluge said, but “ultimately, we want to be in every state in the country. We also want to be in Europe and Asia, and that’s what we’re working toward right now.” Indeed, Moses was traveling to China, entering Kluge wines in Hong Kong competitions and doing his best to flog the idea that, because they’re buying up expensive Bordeaux by the truckload, the Chinese would want expensive Virginia wine as well. 

The 45-room Albemarle House, with an asking price that has dropped from $100 million to $16 million.

At the same time that she was talking up Kluge Estate’s big future, Patricia Kluge was beginning to divest herself of some of the trappings of wealth. She sold a bunch of silver objets d’art at Christie’s, and then, on October 30, 2009, it was reported that she was putting Albemarle House on the market for $100 million.

Once again we were told that this did not indicate any financial problems. “The house is beautiful, but it’s huge,” Mrs. Kluge told The Progress. “We have other properties we want to visit and we want to spend more time traveling. We’re not giving up the winery. …We just want to change our personal lives.”

March saw the first major blow to this façade of financial calm, as the first and only house that had been completed in the massively hyped Vineyard Estates project was foreclosed on and sold at auction. Oddly, the buyer was Kluge’s husband Bill Moses, who bid $3.7 million for Glen Love, a 6,500-square-foot “cottage” that would be their new home now that they were leaving Albemarle House. The beleaguered Estates project faced no sales and a $2 million lawsuit by the hapless real estate agent tasked with selling luxury homes long after the housing bubble had burst.

And so the sell-off continued, Kluge starting to look unavoidably like someone with a liquidity problem and not just an itch to travel. April 2010 saw the auctioning of several major pieces of Mrs. Kluge’s jewelry, which raked in around $5 million, and in June she sold most of her furniture, for $15.2 million. Meanwhile, the price of Albemarle House was cut in half and then in half again, to $24 million. Still, the song remained the same: Nothing would change the Kluge-Moses commitment to making great Virginia wine.

But in the waning months of 2010, the talk of downsizing and new lives ended as the Virginia wine empire that Patricia Kluge had so desperately tried to build began to crumble around her.

On October 30, Bill Moses announced that, due to the delinquent $38.4 million loan, Farm Credit of the Virginias had foreclosed on the winery and would be auctioning off the entire business: vines, barrels and Farm Shop. The auction took place in December with around 50 people in attendance, but no bids were placed, and so the bank bought back the winery for $19 million. In February, Albemarle House was foreclosed on for lack of payment on the $23 million mortgage, and Sonabank called in a $17.4 million loan for the Vineyard Estates project, causing the failed housing project to go into foreclosure as well.

And in the middle of all this, John Kluge, the benevolent ex who’d made Patricia Kluge famous and rich, died at the age of 95, his own fortune firmly intact.

Rising from affluence to poverty 

On Saturday, December 11, roughly 30 people stood shivering in the Madison County warehouse that the now bank-owned Kluge Estate Winery & Vineyard had once rented to store its wine.

 

Now the bank has foreclosed on and bought back Glen Love, the spec house for the failed Vineyard Estates development that Kluge and Bill Moses moved into after leaving Albemarle House.

The building was cold and stark, the white walls and white cases of wine, some 15,000 in all, harshly illuminated by the florescent lights. The auction was an industry-only affair and the attendees were looking to buy a lot of wine for cheap. After a brief tasting of the wines, bidding began in five and 10 case lots, but that soon increased. Cheers went up from the crowd when Siips restaurant owner George Benford bought 50 cases. Despite the morgue-like atmosphere, the crowd was giddy, joking with each other about “how the mighty have fallen.”

The bidding sank lower. Cases started going for $14, in 10 and 20 case lots, until Richard Hewitt, the wine buyer for Keswick Hall, bought 100 cases for $2 a case. The bank halted the bidding and imposed a $35 minimum. Any cheaper and they couldn’t afford to keep the auction going.

Market Street Wineshop, my place of employment, purchased 140 cases and sold them all in 48 hours. It was a madhouse. Whole families came in to stock up on the poor little rich girl’s cheap wine. It was a smash and grab affair, like watching people loot stores during a riot. Certainly some people had actually liked the wine before, but most just saw it as a chance to grab a billionaire’s wine for $4 a bottle. For all of them, it was an opportunity to ruminate on the vagaries of fortune and fortunes, to shake their heads and grin and feel somehow vindicated.

Because she was friends with people like Robert Mondavi, Patricia Kluge’s understanding of success was severely twisted. Her only model of how to make it was the Mondavi model, success on a massive, worldwide scale. Taking a regional winery national doesn’t happen overnight, especially when that winery is in Virginia.

The Kluge Estate also suffered from a serious branding problem. It made the mistake of thinking that the name and face of Patricia Kluge was all that was needed to sell the wine. In a 2004 Los Angeles Times article, Kluge tells the reporter, over dinner and a $115 bottle of her 2001 New World Red, that her wealth and fame are enough to make the winery a success.

“Anyone who counts in Los Angeles knows who I am,” Kluge said. “They’re the people who’ll buy my wine. I don’t need a story in the Los Angeles Times.” 

The reporter replied that the LA Times has over a million subscribers and perhaps a few of them hadn’t heard of her.

“I don’t need a million people,” she said. “I only have a limited number of cases, and I can sell all of them to my friends.”

But the number of cases didn’t stay limited. It grew to almost 40,000 a year, and it turned out that the name Patricia Kluge was not well-known enough to sell her wine nationally and perhaps not liked enough to help sell it locally.

Old friends: Before he bailed her out, Donald Trump attended Patricia’s wedding to John Kluge in 1981.

In April of 2011, the majority of the Kluge winery was purchased by none other than Donald Trump, an old friend of Mrs. Kluge’s, who had in fact attended her wedding to John Kluge 30 years ago. 

Trump says he plans on keeping Kluge and Moses around to help run the winery they just finished destroying, and he says he’s interested in buying Albemarle House, just not for the current price of $16 million. Let’s hope that never happens. In 1990, Mrs. Kluge expressed her desire to save Charlottesville from over development, telling Washingtonian Magazine that she saw “how easily it could be spoiled by unsympathetic developers.” Well now, thanks to her, one of the least sympathetic developers imaginable has been handed the Key to the County, and Kluge seems totally fine with it.

“Donald plans to open it to the public and make it the most amazing experience in the world,” she said in the Daily Beast. “Hopefully it will be the most visited place in America.”

Trump, with his three wives, operatic divorces and towering ego, resembles some mutated mirror image of Kluge herself. We’re probably stuck with both of them forever, twin towers of greed and hair, flailing around desperately for any possible way to maintain the illusion that they’re important.

But as spectacular as the Kluge collapse has been, it’s perhaps wrong to write the Kluge Estate Winery & Vineyard off as a total failure.

“To their credit,” Mr. X told me, “they set themselves on a path that broke new ground for a Virginia winery. They swung for the fences and it took them 10 years to collapse.”

Imagine if the top Kluge wine, the New World Red, had never paraded around in velvet-lined boxes, but had instead been priced at $25 from the start. With the Michel Rolland name to sell it, and without the Kluge name to hold it back, the wine would probably have sold five times as much as it did. Temptation fueled by rampant ego is the bane of the wine industry. Without it, Patricia Kluge’s winery might very well have been a success. And without it, no one else would try and do what she did.

At the beginning of May, I received an e-mail touting the initial offering from a new Virginia vineyard called RdV, whose top wine is available for the high, high price of $88. According to a recent article in the Washington Post, the goal of owner Rutger de Vink “is to prove once and for all that Virginia can produce wine that ranks among the world’s best.” It’s a familiar quote, as is the recipe being used for success: a famous French wine consultant (Eric Boissenot in this case), marketing that emphasizes exclusivity, and this question: What’s possible when you start with a lot, and aim for the sky?

Nothing beside remains

“Money, to me, is just there,” Patricia Kluge once said. “I never think of it at all.”

Maybe the fall of the house of Kluge is a kind of revenge, unfair though it may be, for all the Americans for whom money has ceased, no matter how hard they work, to be just there. Let’s move the tired, the poor, the newly foreclosed-upon masses into Albemarle house and feed them from her larders. Let them drink her wine while she drowns in it, a sacrifice for undeserved good fortune.

Or perhaps she’s already found her punishment. Glen Love, the multi-million dollar “cottage” that Kluge and Moses had already rescued from the bank once before, was foreclosed on again at the end of April and auctioned off for a second time three weeks later. A representative for Trump and another man bid against each other for about 15 minutes, but came nowhere near the $2.5 million assessment, forcing the bank to step in and buy it back. And so Patricia Kluge seems doomed to end up living like the rest of us, in a house she can’t afford, drinking a bottle of cheap wine in front of the television, with her un-famous husband who hopefully loves her for who she really is.

*This quote was changed May 24. Previously, it misattributed the Hemingway novel and mangled its context. 


 

The art of social climbing

Patricia Kluge's path to winemaking

1948: Born Patricia Maureen Rose in Baghdad to an English father and half-Scottish, half-Iraqi mother.

1965: Moves to London with her mother.

1967: At 19, starts belly dancing at a West London club. “It was an epiphany,” Kluge said of her discovery of 1960s Swinging London. “It was so invigorating to live in an open society. I didn’t have to wear gloves anymore. Mini-skirts and boots were much more interesting, so I seized the moment.” Meets and marries 52-year-old Russell Gay, publisher of Knave, a pornographic British magazine for which Kluge posed and wrote a sex advice column.

1969: Appears in erotica film The Nine Ages of Nakedness.

Early 1970s: Divorces Russell Gay.

1976: Visits New York, meets John Werner Kluge, then 60. “At one party,” he told the New York Times, “she cooked the dinner and then she did a belly dance on the table and I said to myself, ‘Where have I been all my life?’”

1981: Marries John Kluge, who divorced his second wife in 1978, in New York City’s St. Patrick’s Cathedral. Wears white.

Early 1980s: Couple adopts son, John Kluge, Jr.

1985: Completes construction of 45-room Albemarle House on 6,000 acres dubbed Albemarle Farms.

1985: Chairs a charity ball in Palm Beach. Guests include Charles and Diana, but the British press discloses Patricia’s past in advance. The Kluges make sure they are traveling abroad the night of the ball.

1988: Expresses “shock” at the arrest of three British gamekeepers under con-tract to Albemarle Farms, who are found guilty of conspiracy to preserve game birds—ducks, partridges and pheasants—by killing hundreds of federally protected birds of prey. One gamekeeper admits to jury that he shot “probably 25” hawks; bird carcasses were hidden in groundhog holes in a cemetery.

1990: Divorces John Kluge over “irreconcilable differences”; reportedly receives in settlement the interest on $1 billion as well as Albemarle House.

1990: Governor Doug Wilder’s travel log shows repeated use of the state heli-copter for travel to Charlottesville, but he denies anything more than friendship with Patricia. The pair spend a spring weekend together in Nantucket. Wilder names Patricia to UVA’s Board of Visitors.

1991: Invests in Carden Jennings, pub-lisher of Albemarle Magazine, which changes its name to Kluge Carden Jennings.

1991: Sued for unpaid overtime by former butler, who is awarded $14,000 plus attorney’s fees.

1994: Carden Jennings’ founders buy out Kluge’s share and drop her name from the company moniker.

1999: Launches Kluge Estate Winery & Vineyard.

2000: Marries William Moses, former IBM executive and self-described “Jersey Shore boy,” whom she met while serving on the board for NYU’s Tisch School of the Arts.

 

 
Comments
I found this article VERY amusing! - I guess it goes to show the old saying: "she's all fur and no knickers" (meaning: all investment is made on appearance, leaving nothing left for the bare essentials) rings true! - I am sure that Mr. Kluge is laughing in his grave.
karma policeMay 24th, 2011 01:04pm
Good article on Kluge wine. However, is it salient to caption the photo of the Kluge's walking their farm by stating that Mr. Moses is her "third" husband? He's her husband. Period. In a bittersweet observation (for them), on the day of the Albemarle House auction I was shopping in Bed, Bath and Beyond and bumped into the Moses in the linen and towels section. I was going to give them my 20% off coupon, but figured I still needed it more than they did.
RickMay 24th, 2011 01:37pm
Maybe if I drink some more wine, I'll see the point of this article. Pompous titles, quotes from Ernest Hemingway? Aside from that, it's just one big retread. It's not just what's on the label, Cville, it's what's inside the bottle.
Beaujolais NouveauMay 24th, 2011 01:46pm
You misquoted and misattributed the Hemingway line quoted before the article. The line - "Gradually then suddenly." - was actually in "The Sun Also Rises" which debuted three years before the crash of 1929. You also misspelled "Ark" in the movie title "Raiders of the Lost Ark."
Chris J.May 24th, 2011 03:19pm
While there are some solid facts inserted into the article, it seems very mean-spirited, loaded with snide asides and unnecessary commentary about the subject. Who cares where someone came from, who they were married to, or what they wear? A local person started a business, employed local people, tried to succeed and did not. Why does the reporter seem so cheery about it? If the wine was nice and did good things for Virginia and other wineries, shouldn't we be sad instead of making jokes?
ConradMay 24th, 2011 04:47pm
I would have thought that your editor would have flagged this article as the tabloid trash that it is. To call yourself a journalist, J. Tobias Beard, is a disservice to all of those in the profession. Your article is a deliberate attack on a person and has no journalistic integrity. Your opinion is strewn all over the article. Remember, you are supposed to be a journalist and you should do research as part of your article and not pull quotes from previous articles or quote a friend, “Mr. X”, who would not even go on the record. If you did any real journalism, you would have discovered a lot of incredible things that Patricia Kluge has done for Charlottesville, UVA and individuals who know her personally. Most of these things are not publically known because Patricia has done them not for publicity, but out of the generosity of her own heart. We have all fallen on hard times. Patricia and her husband Bill will come out of this and be better people as a result of these challenges they now face. J. Tobias Beard, you are and have always been a third rate writer. After this article, you have only proven that once again. Please do us a favor and write something in your next article that has sound facts, quotes from people other then your friends like Mr. X and has at least a smidgen of journalistic integrity.
DrewMay 24th, 2011 08:35pm
In addition to the above mentioned errors, this article is fairly dripping with old fashioned sexism. A "strumpet"? Really?
For shameMay 25th, 2011 12:20am
Beard should stick to pouring wine.
JuneMay 25th, 2011 12:54am
This article portrays the infamous Patricia Kluge as a lost soul in search of something that money can't buy. As I see it, life is about choices and the prices that we pay for them. She went "all in" and lost... does she need to continuing paying? In my opinion, the character assignation by J. Tobias Beard is over the top...
GarlandMay 25th, 2011 10:17am
Touche'. What a fun, informative article to read. I do agree, however, with several of the previous commentators that the article would perhaps be best labeled as an editorial rather than presented as a straight news article. Some of the rhetoric is skewed, though often delightful, especially the analogy presenting Mrs. Kluge and Mr Trump as "twin towers of greed and hair". I do wish to point out to my fellow commentators whom so fiercely defend and ennoble Mrs. Kluge that it very easy to be generous with other people's money as she has been doling out bank money for years. One should consider the ill effects of her actions on the financial health of the banks (and its investors) that lent her money in good faith.
Retro_ZenMay 25th, 2011 12:00pm
To wine industry outsiders I can see how this article may seem a bit harsh. That is your opinion and you were actually given the opinion of someone (Mr. Beard) who is in the know, and does have solid information. This article is quite accurate and in no way sexist or misleading. The only part that is not adequate is the Mr X statements, which were all way off the mark. Kluge has no bearing whatsoever on the Virginia Wine Industry. Many of her early wines were made of fruit from California. She hired employees from other states or countries and fired them before thye'd even have a chance at residency. The few locals that she did employ, I can only vouch for one that ran away as fast as she could. The wines were all subpar for the price. If anything her existence served as a slap in the face to all of us who have grown up in this industry, and worked as hard as we have to bring the industry to where it is today. A successful, appreciated and soon to be renowned wine region. Taking issue with Tobias' article is one thing, but it should prompt you to ask yourself what you actually know. What factual information do you have? The author of this article criticizes people based on real, factual information (or else he'd be in quite the civil disaster), and it was well written. You critcize the author based on your opinions shaped by the media that doesn't give you factual information. I suggest we all wait and see what happens with the property and winery in the future. Something smells very fishy and it isn't the kelp emulsion I sprayed in the vineyard today, or me for that matter. I doubt this is the last OMG moment for all of us in reaction to whats ahead.
ajMay 25th, 2011 05:34pm
To the defenders of this woman, she certainly has donated and lent her name to good causes but there is definitely another side to her that many here locally have experienced. Tobias should do a follow up on all the local people she has stiffed over the years as it shows her true character. She has reaped what she sowed. Karma 1 Kluge 0. Unfortunately, there are many innocent casualties caught up in this as well. Her Hubris combined with an unrealistic business plan as to how to build a brand and winery in Virginia led to her demise. The banks also got what they deserve for being caught up in the hype. If the Donald is so inclined to keep these 2 overinflated egos on at the winery, you can expect the same result. Ever heard how to turn a Billionaire into a millionaire? Start an unsuccessful winery! Better yet, rehire failed management.
Wine loverMay 25th, 2011 10:20pm
"One should consider the ill effects of her actions on the financial health of the banks (and its investors) that lent her money in good faith." Just like everyone else who owns a house? I fail to see what Mrs. Kluge did to deserve this venomous, unfair story. Nowhere is her philanthropy mentioned, or her good-faith goals. Was it wrong of her to put everything she had into helping this area grow in the eyes of the world, even if it failed? Did she harm someone and I am not aware of it? I know next to nothing about Patricia, but this article treats her like filth for, as far as I can tell, no reason. Is a lowly retail cashier at a local wine shop jealous of her fame and success and business failures? Would any of us speak this way of our own mothers or wives and their faults?
SniffleMay 25th, 2011 10:33pm
I have no personal feelings good or bad about Patricia Kluge, but I was really struck by how vicious this article seemed. Did the author make no mistakes at age 19 or 21? That's how old Kluge was when she posed naked and then made the "professional naked person" movie. It seems beside the point and sexist to keep bringing that up as if it has serious relevance to who she is today. I like to read in-depth articles about local people, but it seemed like this time the author had a personal axe to grind, which made the story seem unprofessional. And, seriously, I can't believe he wrote this: "Let them drink her wine while she drowns in it..." Nice.
SharonMay 25th, 2011 10:49pm
The observations of Patricia Kluge/Patricia Rose being a “professional naked person” don’t seem to be particularly sexist, but rather a (admittedly unkind) comical jibe. I think that the underlying point is that she was able to divorce herself from that life, by way of profiteering from a divorce of an old man, she subsequently aimed to qualify proper respectability for herself, by establishing a new persona of a wholesome, earthly, grounded viticulturalist, but in the end, could not resist the old modus-operandi of getting it all out for everyone to see; which over stretched even her deep-purse and resulted in the unraveling of her aspirations. Probably, largely because she didn’t actually make the fortune that she acquired, so was unable to manage it.
small-town-peopleMay 26th, 2011 11:44am
I thought the article was spot on. Patricia Kluge, if anyone has ever worked for her, met her, or drank her wine you'd know she is awful. From a locals point of view, she was labeled at best, a whore. Working her way up to the top, no, she didn't make the money; she married into it. She abused many of her staff, and left them in tears talking about her for years. Her wines were the worst I have ever tasted. Not only that, for a tasting, one would have to buy the glass separately, when most vineyards gave you the glass with your tasting. Not that it matters, but still. I didn't need to show off the Kluge namesake, if drinking another vineyards wine. Isn't that false advertising, oh right, that's what she was doing to the banks. After having several Kluge wines, I discovered the only decent thing about the entire business was the beauty radiating from a dusk wedding on the property. I hope those continue, as other local businesses trying to work for a living rely on the venue.
Straight ForwardMay 26th, 2011 02:24pm
To the writer: Thank you for telling us where you work. I'll be sure to buy wine somewhere else from now on.
Proud StrumpetMay 26th, 2011 05:33pm
My questions: 1) Did Mr. Beard attempt to contact Mrs. Kluge or her family/staff for this article? If not, very lazy and biased journalism. 2) Why is Mr. Beard so vindictive towards Mrs. Kluge? Did her hubris not impress him and he's decided to drag her through the mud publicly? If so, unprofessional and a real dick move. 3) This article seems to imply that she had a bad business model and that was her main fault. The fact that she married rich and young was also her fault. These are both gross over-simplifications. If we wanted to publicly humiliate people who have bad business models and lose money for their investors, then throw a rock on the downtown mall and you'll hit someone who fits that description. Are you, Mr. Beard, faultless yourself? What day was it that you were tired of being a sales clerk and decided to humiliate Mrs. Kluge in a very public forum? I have never met Mrs. Kluge and she may well be an egotist, a controlling business owner, a woman who married for money (what if, she married for love and her lover just happened to be rich? what is she to do, say "no thanks"?) and many other things. But I have yet to hear one person say how they were personally destroyed or harmed by her in a lasting way. C-VILLE published a favorable article (equally devoid of new or notable information as this article) putting into a good light one Ted Genoways, who was speculated to have pushed a coworker to suicide. Has Mrs. Kluge been guilty of anything on par or worse than this?
anaisMay 26th, 2011 07:41pm
There is plenty to criticize Patricia Kluge over her handling of her failed wine business, but calling her a strumpet and bringing up her past has no bearing whatsoever on her failures as a businesswoman. Also, she is hardly the first or the last "golddigger" to live in the Charlottesville area. Somehow, I think if she were a man, the stuff about her personal life would not have been mentioned.
A ReaderMay 27th, 2011 12:48am
J. Tobias Beard - What is your take on this discussion? As the person who wrote this article, what say you!? I presume that you have an opinion on the points put forward? Do you feel that the angle and perspective that you put forward was a valid one? If so, let us hear your thoughts on how this piece is relevant and justifiable. Thank you!
Talking trashMay 27th, 2011 10:41am
I can vouch for the veracity of many of Beard's observations. However, unlike many in Cville, I've never found her personal life before her marriage to John Kluge to be germane to her later behavior. If anything, it seemed to be an indicator of personal strength to pull oneself up by ones bootstraps, and move on. No doubt she's always been a strong woman and a hard worker. Her downfall was her chronic thoughtlessness, and erratic management style. When she'd hire decent managers, she wouldn't let them do their jobs. I think the most telling quote is the one where she says that she never thought about money because it was always there. The problem was that she never stopped to think that others weren't so fortunate. Loyal (mostly local) long-term employees were treated as disposable, discarded on a whim, some ending up homeless or destitute in the process-- all after having been worked incredibly hard. Meanwhile, a few grifter employees (hired for the "cachet" they would bring) ran amok through the company, pouring gasoline on management fires, and creating a pervasive atmosphere of paranoia. As a businessman, Bill Moses should have known better, and should have addressed the poisonous corporate culture that caused the company to destroy itself from within. I've always admired Kluge's creative vision, and her drive to be the best, and actually liked her very much personally. I'm sorry that things didn't work out for the winery. It was an amazing vision, and could have easily been brought to fruition if more care had been exerted to nurture the company. However, she certainly needs to take ownership of her part in things, especially considering the endless instances of random and entirely unnecessary cruelty that former employers suffered at the hands of this organization.
From the FoxholeMay 30th, 2011 09:50am
J. Tobias Beard is sexist?! This comes as a surprise to... oh wait, nobody.
news flashMay 31st, 2011 08:52am
As someone who has worked in the Virginia wine industry, and who has met Patricia Kluge, I can say that this article, while harsh, is entirely factual. Kluge treated her employees like trash and thought nothing of hiring marquee names and then running them out of there when they had the nerve to think independently and lead their departments. Big-name chefs were brought in for her farm shop, and if they wanted to control the menu, she wouldn't have it. No one got to make any decisions except her, and as the failures show, she didn't know what she was doing. Her ego is monstrous and she expected people to do her bidding. Everyone who had contact with her professionally and often personally had at least one horror story to tell, and several had many. While Tobias went a bit far with the vitriol, he hit the mark in showing why the winery failed. She may not have spurred someone on to suicide, but she made her neighbors miserable, dumped on the very people she should have listened to, and ENTIRELY BROUGHT HER MISFORTUNES ON HERSELF. I and many others in the business have ZERO sympathy for her. She got what she deserved, and those of you whining and saying this article is mean have NO idea how wretched she is or how she abused her staff. There was no excuse for her behavior and no defense of it either. Get off your high horses and be glad to be one of the fortunate ones who didn't have the misfortune to deal with her.
CKMay 31st, 2011 09:38am
Patricia Kluge may have been a terrible boss and as dislikable as people say. She may have dug her own financial grave -- seems she has. That's not the issue. It's that pseudo-journalism by an overheated writer treats her like she's beneath contempt right out the gate. Beard obviously didn't even think enough of her to talk to her himself. He uses other newspaper stories to prop up his lazy assertion of rumors as facts and then he tries to camoflage with snark and ain't-I-clever writing. His concern is not for the people Kluge mistreated, because if it had been, he'd have spoken to them himself and put them in this story. He obviously just wanted an excuse to publish his judgments about her sex life and her marriages.
JuneMay 31st, 2011 01:02pm
I enjoyed the article thoroughly. The best part may have been the comment from the person who ran into the wealthy-cum-commoner couple in Bed, Bath and Beyond. The truly rich do not shop at BB&B, at least I should think that most of them would send a servant to do such mundane tasks. A lot of people are dogpiling on the author, but this does not even attempt to be a journalistic piece. It is clearly more in the nature of a magazine feature, but at any rate it is decidedly truthful and telling. Perhaps it contains too much Schadenfreude. But anyone who goes from one of America's richest wives to mega-million divorcee to broke bankrupt should expect someone at last to publish some unvarnished truth about one of America's most privileged people. Even though I think it is fair to show her in the unflattering light of this article, I hope she has learned some lessons in humility and especially in money management. Look at her quotes around the web, and you will see that this is someone who needs to be knocked from her high horse in order to fit into horse country without being condescending.
CharlottesitizenJune 21st, 2011 09:54pm
Work well done!
PatJuly 2nd, 2011 10:40am
These comments perhaps resemble a Kluge wine: "A delicate and delightful bouquet of Schadenfreude is admixed with the sour contempt of the undeserving wealthy for people who work for a living."
PekoeJuly 4th, 2011 03:10pm
This piece is quite deceiving in terms of journalism and information. Mixing apples with oranges will not make any kind of wine and Mr Tobias mixed the person with the entrepreneur. Although the same person, are not the same story. Definitely is clear that there is a very personal sentiment in this piece and on the long run, it ended up becoming cheap vinegar. Too bad because this could end up being an interesting and informative chronicle and besides providing a reliable narrative, could become a message to VA and the wine industry. Too bad! a missed chance.
JPalAugust 17th, 2011 12:14am
Here is similar perspective: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2007961/Patricia-Kluge-Fall-belly-dancer-billionairess-How-ex-cloakroom-girl-porn-star-married-Americas-richest-man-went-bankrupt.html
John GaultSeptember 19th, 2011 10:25am
I will always remember Patricia as a bold and extremely intelligent person who happened to also be a customer. Her hubby, William is a dynamic and sharp businessman. Together, they went for it and the landslide brought them down. It is an often told tale, but they lived it with style and they worked hard. Further, they were fair-minded and as for the firings of the experts, well poo-poo happens and weal often makes the situation seem worse. These are good people and Trump will do well to keep them in the pic because they are assets.
John ArmentroutNovember 21st, 2011 09:57am
Have your say
*
*
*
Your comment will be displayed after it has been reviewed by our editors. Please refer to our comments policy if you have any questions, or email editor@c-ville.com.
C-VILLE site search by Charlottesville's Best News and Entertainment

http://www.zeustheaters.com/
Cathcart
www.theparamount.net/
Charlottesville Business Innovation Council Awards
www.facebook.com/BristlesHairDesignandDaySpa
www.ladiff.com/ladeals-c-82.html
Top Ads
Circulation VerifiedCopyright © 2012, C-VILLE Holdings
Powered by PLANet w3 CMS Content Management System
PLANet Systems Group 2012